Description
A Program is a specific set of activities carried out according to guidelines to achieve a defined purpose. Program profiles on CrimeSolutions tell us whether a specific program was found to achieve its goals when it was carefully evaluated. Program ratings, described below, tells us that a program is likely to produce the observed result if implemented as described in the profile.
Icon | Rating | Description |
---|---|---|
|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). |
|
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) |
|
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). |
Search and apply filters to the table below to narrow the list of hundreds of program. Note that selecting a filter or entering a keyword automatically narrows the list of programs below.
What's the difference?
Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Turkey) |
|
Procedural justice, Law enforcement | This intervention involves officers wearing cameras on their uniforms to increase citizens’ intentions to comply with police and improve their perceptions of police during traffic stops. The program is rated Promising. Drivers who encountered officers with cameras had statistically significant increases in both compliance and cooperation with officers and improved perceptions of procedural justice and police legitimacy, compared with drivers who encountered officers not wearing cameras. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Denver (Colorado) Crime Gun Intelligence Center |
|
Violent crime, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Robbery, Law enforcement, Arrests, Databases, Evidence, Policing strategies, Crime prevention, Prosecution, Courts, Law enforcement operations, Investigations | The program focuses on reducing violent gun crime by disrupting the cycle of gun violence by relying on forensic science and data analysis to identify, investigate, and prosecute individuals who use guns in criminal activity, and the sources of their guns. The program is rated No Effects. The program did not significantly affect homicides or aggravated assaults with a firearm but was shown to significantly reduce violent crime and robbery with a firearm. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: eHealth Familias Unidas |
|
Schools, Mental health, Suicide, Underage drinking, Treatment, School climate, Internet, Computers, Substance abuse, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | The goals of the online mental health program for Hispanic families are to prevent and reduce depressive and anxious symptoms, suicide ideation/behaviors, and drug use in Hispanic youth. The program is rated No Effects. The program did not have a statistically significant impact on past-90-day alcohol use and family functioning. The treatment group had a statistically significant reduction in past-90-day drug use, prescription drug use, and cigarette use, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Impact of Mobile Technology Devices on Street Checks and Crime Incidents (Australia) |
|
Law enforcement, Computers, Internet, Databases, Policing strategies, Patrol, Crime prevention, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | The mobile device and software for this program were developed to enable frontline police officers to access police database records and upload timely and accurate information while out in the field. This program is rated Promising. The program led to statistically significantly increases in the total number of recorded street checks, the total number of recorded driving offenses, and the number of drug offenses (possession and use) recorded per month by police officers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Risk-Based Policing Initiative (Kansas City, Missouri) |
|
Situational crime prevention, Violent crime, Community policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement | This program was a place-based crime policing initiative implemented for 1 year to reduce violent crime. Risk-based policing initiatives promote data-informed decisions based on a process of defining the problem, gathering information, and analyzing data. The program is rated Promising. The program resulted in a statistically significant reduction of 22.6 percent in violent crimes in the intervention areas, compared with the comparison areas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus Mindfulness Meditation for Adolescent Alcohol Consumption (Australia) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This program uses psycho–social and present-moment awareness techniques to target adolescents’ alcohol-related cognitions and prevent their alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received the intervention had reduced growth of alcohol consumption, compared with adolescents in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in both negative and positive alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: PSYCHOPATHY.COMP (Portugal) |
|
Mental health | This is an individual compassion-focused, therapy-based intervention adapted from traditional compassionate-focused therapy to reduce psychopathic traits in youth in a correctional setting in Portugal. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease measures of psychopathic traits, grandiose manipulative, callous–unemotional, impulsive irresponsible, daring irresponsible, and conduct disorder traits. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority Vocational Support and Supervision Program (Israel) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs, Rape and sexual assault | This program provides community supervision and services to individuals released early from prison to help them find employment and reduce their recidivism. The program is rated Effective. Program participants were less likely to be reincarcerated and had higher rates of integration into the workforce, compared with individuals who did not participate in the program. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Boston, Massachusetts) |
|
Arrests, Sensors/Surveillance, Use of force, Law enforcement, Crime prevention, Situational crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Arrests | This involves police officers wearing cameras on their uniforms to improve the civility of their interactions with citizens. The program is rated Effective. There were statistically significant reductions in citizen complaints against police and police use-of-force reports for officers who wore cameras, compared with those who did not, and statistically significant reductions in complaints against control officers in the treatment districts, compared with officers in the untreated districts. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Imprisonment for Individuals Who Committed a Drunk Driving Offense (New South Wales, Australia) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Prisons, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Law enforcement, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This involves prison time for individuals who have committed drunk-driving offenses to reduce their risk of recidivism upon their release. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference between individuals in the treatment group (who received prison time) and the comparison group (who received a suspended imprisonment sentence) on reoffending with a driving-while-under-the-influence-of-alcohol offense within 6 months’, 24 months’, or 5 years’ time. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Young Adult Family Check-Up (YA-FCU) |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Substance abuse | The program focuses on the relationship between young adults and their parents to prevent substance misuse and other high-risk behaviors and enhance protective factors such as improving communication and strengthening familial relationships, encouraging healthy peer and romantic relationships, and promoting self-efficacy. The program is rated No Effects. It made no statistically significant impact on reducing the risk level for a problematic transition into young adulthood. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: New Orientation for Reducing Threats to Health from Secretive-problems That Affect Readiness (NORTH STAR) |
|
Alcohol, Prescription drugs, Treatment, Military personnel, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a prevention planning and implementation system designed to improve risk and protective factors, and reduce secretive problems, in military communities. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the bases assigned to NORTH STAR and the comparison bases on measures of physical or emotional interpersonal violence/partner abuse, physical or emotional child abuse, hazardous drinking, suicidality, or prescription drug misuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Bringing in the Bystander High School Curriculum |
|
Stalking, Violent crime, Assault, Dating violence, School climate, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | The goal of this bystander-focused, classroom-delivered curriculum is to reduce rates of interpersonal violence among high school students. The program is rated No Effects. The program had no statistically significant impact on various measures of interpersonal violence, victim empathy, and measures of proactive bystander behavior. There was a statistically significant decrease for the treatment group in bystander denial about the role students could play in preventing interpersonal violence. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Explore, Question, Understand, Investigate and Practice, Plan, Succeed (EQUIPS) Domestic Abuse Program (New South Wales, Australia) |
|
Crime prevention, Investigations | This program targets behavior changes in men who have committed a domestic violence offense, to reduce their risk of reoffending. The program is rated Promising. Men in the treatment group had statistically significant reductions in their rate of reconvictions and time to both their first violent and general reconvictions, compared with men in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in general or domestic violence reoffending within 12 months. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation Rowan (United Kingdom) |
|
Arson, Burglary, Assault, Robbery, Sensors/Surveillance, Patrol, Law enforcement, Sanctions, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Crime prevention, Victims of crime | This program involves 15 minutes of police patrol in high-crime hot spots to reduce crime. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in reports of violent crimes and robbery and other crimes against personal victims in hot spots on treatment days, compared with control days. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: One Love Escalation Workshop for Dating Abuse Prevention in the Military |
|
Dating violence, Military personnel, Bullying, Crime prevention | This program involves film and guided discussion to promote bystander behavior related to dating abuse. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on intervening when a peer was being harmed or physically hurt by an intimate partner, or when a peer was intoxicated or being bullied. The intervention group was statistically significantly more likely to intervene in peer self-harm, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Promoting First Relationships for Native Families |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Tribal youth | This is a home-visiting program to foster positive caregiver–child relationships in Native families. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had higher quality caregiver–child interactions, and caregivers had increased knowledge of their children’s social–emotional needs and reported fewer depressive symptoms, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups on child externalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Impact of the Wraparound Program for Dually Involved Youth (Florida) on Youth Arrests |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is an intensive case management model for providing services to youths simultaneously involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference in youth arrests between youths who participated in the Wraparound Program, compared with youths in the treatment-as-usual condition. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Restoring Promise (South Carolina) |
|
Prisons | This is a prison housing unit program for young adults that seeks to change correctional culture and increase safety. The program is rated Promising. Young adults in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower likelihood of violent charges and convictions, compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups on the number of disciplinary charges or convictions, or serious incidents or events in the facilities. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Take CHARGE! Curriculum for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders |
|
Mental health, Treatment, School climate | This is a curriculum that targets students with emotional and behavioral disorders, with the overall goal of improving knowledge and development of social problem-solving skills. The program is rated Effective. Students who participated in the Take CHARGE! program had a statistically significant greater likelihood of reporting increased knowledge of and improvements in problem-solving behaviors, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: North Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Probation, Law enforcement, Sanctions, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Crime prevention, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program seeks to reduce the rearrests of individuals previously convicted of driving while under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs through intensive testing and monitoring of drug and alcohol consumption. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rates of DUI arrests by roughly 9 percent in counties that implemented the program, compared with counties that did not implement the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Supervision with Immediate Enforcement (SWIFT) Court for Gang-Involved Individuals (Texas) |
|
Drug testing, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Gangs, Gang Crime | This is a specialized court program that targets high-risk gang-affiliated individuals with felony convictions for intensive supervision, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Gang members who participated in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood of probation revocation than gang members who did not participate. But there were no statistically significant differences in new arrests between the groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Geographically Based Focused Deterrence Intervention (Midwest) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Law enforcement, Crime prevention | This was a focused deterrence intervention designed to reduce the presence of gun violence and gang activity. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in confirmed shots fired, residents’ reports of hearing gunshots, and residents’ reports of seeing gang activity. However, there was no statistically significant impact on calls for service for shots fired. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Restorative Justice Conferencing in Rhode Island Schools |
|
Youth development, School climate, Schools, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school program to address student misbehavior and repair harm. The program is rated No Effects. Middle schoolers in the treatment group had a statistically significant higher likelihood of disciplinary referrals and out-of-school suspensions, compared with comparison group students, which was the opposite of what was intended. There were no statistically significant differences in disciplinary referrals or suspensions between high schoolers in the treatment and the comparison groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: California Prison Industry Authority (CALPIA) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Inmate programs, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a training and production program for incarcerated individuals, with the overall goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Compared with individuals in the waitlist comparison group, individuals who participated in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested, reconvicted, or returned to custody during the 3-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Denver (Colorado) Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond Initiative (Denver SIB) |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities | This is a program for homeless individuals who are often in jail, to increase their housing stability and reduce their criminal justice involvement. The program is rated Effective. Individuals in the treatment group had statistically significant reductions in arrest, jail stays, days in jail, and shelter stays and visits, and statistically significant increases in mental health services, compared with the control group, but there was no statistically significant effect on substance use services. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Live Court Date Reminder Phone Calls (New York City) |
|
Release on Recognizance, Warrants, Arrests | This program provides calls to individuals who have been arrested and released while they wait to appear for arraignment, to remind them to appear on their scheduled court dates. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in failure-to-appear rates for individuals in all three treatment groups who received phone call reminders, compared with individuals in the control group who did not receive any reminder. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Spotlight Serious Offender Services Unit (Canada) |
|
Youth gangs, Probation, Violent offenders, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Gang Crime, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This was an urban-based intensive supervision program in which high-risk, gang-affiliated youths (ages 12–19) were assigned to work with a probation officer who was paired with a paid “street mentor.” The program is rated Promising. Youths in the program were significantly less likely than those in the comparison group to have a new conviction in the follow-up period of up to 3 years and remained offense-free for a longer period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Environmental Corrections Model (Australia) |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections | This is a community corrections model of probation and parole that focuses on opportunity-reduction strategies to reduce recidivism. The program is rated Effective. There were statistically significant reductions in new arrests and longer time to new arrest for individuals in the treatment group, compared with individuals in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Law Enforcement Framework (Texas) |
|
School safety, Training, School climate, Schools, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime, School climate | This is a framework of recommended practices for integrating police into the educational environment to enhance a safe school climate. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in treatment and control school students’ delinquency, victimization, exclusionary discipline, relationships with adults, perceptions of police, nor school bonding, connectedness, and safety. Treatment school students had statistically significant increases in rule clarity. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Problem-Solving Training (SPST) in a Juvenile Detention Setting |
|
Mental health, Positive youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile justice, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile detention | This intervention was designed to help adolescent males in detention with interpersonal stress and conflict. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on depressive symptoms, recidivism, social problem-solving, anger response, anger control, and inward expression of anger. However, the treatment as usual control condition was found to have a statistically significant reduction on outward expression of anger, a result in the other-than-expected direction. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Milwaukee (Wisconsin) Police Department Body-Worn Cameras |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Evidence, Community policing, Patrol, Use of force, Law enforcement, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | This program equips police with on-officer cameras to record their interactions with civilians. The program is rated No Effects. Camera use had no statistically significant effects on officers’ total number of proactive activities, specifically on the number of traffic stops or business checks, nor on arrests, citizen complaints, and use-of-force incidents. Officers with cameras conducted statistically significantly fewer subject stops, and statistically significantly more park and walks. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Risk Reduction through Family Therapy (RRFT) for Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Drug treatment | The goal of this exposure-based, integrative intervention was to reduce substance use and mental health problems in adolescents who have experienced trauma. The program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on depressive and internalizing symptoms, family cohesion, and family conflict. There were mixed results for PTSD symptoms and substance use. There was no statistically significant impact on externalizing symptoms. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Coaching Boys Into Men (Middle School) |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Recreation, Schools, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This program aims to prevent sexual violence in middle school male athletes. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control group athletes in reports of abuse (relationship, cybersexual, or sexual), sexual harassment, negative bystander behaviors, sex-equitable attitudes, or intention to intervene. Treatment group athletes reported statistically significantly more positive bystander behaviors and recognized more signs of abuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Reentry Services of Clay County (Minnesota) |
|
Probation, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Case Management, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Access to education, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program aimed at improving public safety by assisting youths who commit offenses with comprehensive reentry services following their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference between program and comparison group youths in prevalence of reoffense. Program youths had statistically significantly fewer official juvenile justice contacts within 1 year of release, compared with comparison group youth Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Video (Australia) |
|
Assault, Sensors/Surveillance, Patrol, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Equipment and technology | This program involves police use of video to improve evidence gathering and police and citizen behavior. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in restraining orders issued or assaults on police between body-worn video treatment days and control days (when no officers wore body-worn video). Treatment days had statistically significantly higher rates of use of force, citizen complaints against police, and criminal charges, compared with control days. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Effects of Prison Video Visitation on Recidivism (Minnesota) |
|
Internet, Prisons, Crime prevention | This program aims to reduce recidivism among Minnesota’s prison population by expanding the accessibility of visitation opportunities. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant effect on violence reconviction and technical violation revocations. The program had a statistically significant (small to moderate) impact on general revocations for any offense and reconvictions for felonies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Detroit (Mich.) Ceasefire |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Databases, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Victimization, Gangs, Arrests, Victims of crime | This is a focused deterrence police strategy that was designed to reduce gang- and group-related violence in Detroit, Mich. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found for weapons arrests or shooting victimizations for participants in two age groups (15–24 and 25–34). The program did show a statistically significant reduction in all arrests and violent arrests for individuals who attended the Detroit Ceasefire call-in meetings. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Mindfulness in Schools Project’s “.b” Curriculum |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based program that works to improve emotional awareness and regulation in adolescents to improve their mental health outcomes. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between students who received the intervention and students in the control group who did not receive the intervention in measures of resilience, anxiety, depression, socioemotional functioning, well-being, drug use, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and mindfulness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Hot Spots Policing in the London Underground (London, UK) |
|
Patrol, Situational crime prevention, Policing strategies, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Problem-oriented policing | This policing strategy was designed to deter crime on platforms in high-crime areas of the London Underground. The program is rated Promising. Platforms in the treatment areas had statistically significant reductions in calls for services and crime, relative to the control group, on patrol and nonpatrol days. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Predictive Policing Model in Los Angeles, Calif. |
|
Burglary, Motor vehicle theft, Patrol, Computers, Property crime, Motor vehicle theft, Crime prevention, Larceny/theft, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Problem-oriented policing | This program involved the use of a crime forecasting model to direct police patrol to dynamic hot spots to reduce crime. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in daily crime volume (specifically burglary, car theft, and burglary-theft from vehicle) for police patrols in the treatment condition, compared with patrols in the control condition. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Effects of Body-Worn Cameras on Reducing Rates of Citizen Fatalities |
|
Homicide, Sensors/Surveillance, Death investigations, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | This program involves law enforcement’s use of cameras to record interactions with civilians to reduce citizen fatalities. The program is rated Promising. Agencies that acquired cameras had statistically significant decreases in fatal police–citizen encounters after three years, compared with agencies that did not acquire cameras. There were no statistically significant differences in fatal encounters between a reduced set of agencies with cameras and matched agencies without cameras. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Philadelphia (Pa.) Focused Deterrence Strategy |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Gangs | This was a focused deterrence violence-reduction strategy involving enforcement and services to targeted individuals to address gun and gang violence. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in community-level criminal shootings in treated areas, compared with matched comparison areas, and in shootings around treated gang territories, compared with areas around matched comparison gang territories, at 2 years’ postimplementation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Online Warning Messages Impact on Desistance From Child Sexual Exploitation Material (Australia) |
|
Child pornography, Internet | This intervention displayed online warning messages to Internet users attempting to view barely legal pornography or upload sexual photos of women, to reduce the accessing of child sexual exploitation material online. The program is rated Effective. Individuals in the experimental groups who received the online warning messages were statistically significantly less likely to attempt to enter the websites, compared with individuals who did not receive a warning message. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Specialty Mental Health Probation (Texas) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health | The program targeted individuals on probation with a mental illness. The goal was to reduce rates of community supervision failures. The program is rated Promising. Individuals on specialty probation had both statistically significant lower rates of technical violations and rearrest, and higher receipt of mental health services and dual-diagnosis treatment, compared with individuals on traditional probation. There was no statistically significant impact on substance use treatment and violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Stepped Collaborative Care for Adolescents (Washington State) |
|
Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to reduce violence risk behaviors as well as PTSD and depressive symptoms by providing adolescents with a variety of services following a traumatic injury. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in substance use problems, or PTSD and depressive symptoms, though intervention group patients reported a statistically significant reduction in weapons carrying. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Minnesota Intensive Supervised Release |
|
Sex offenders, Drug testing, Probation, Mental health, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention | This is an intensive, supervised release program for individuals released from prison in Minnesota who are at high risk for reoffending. The primary goal of the program is to reduce recidivism of released individuals. The program is rated Promising. The program reduced the risk of general, felony, and violent reconvictions and any rearrests, but increased the risk of a technical violation revocation. All of these differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project Green Light Detroit |
|
Surveillance, Sensors/Surveillance, Environmental design, Situational crime prevention, Burglary, Crime prevention, Property crime, Crime, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Equipment and technology | This is a place-based intervention that uses environmental design at high-crime businesses in the city to reduce crime and improve public safety. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on disorder occurrences or violent crime. The intervention did result in statistically significant reductions in property crime around treated businesses, compared with matched control businesses, at 1-year postimplementation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Community-Level Intervention on Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes (Calif.) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Regulatory offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to reduce excessive drinking among adolescents and young adults ages 12-25 through community-wide enforcement operations and awareness campaigns. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes among 15- to 30-year-old drivers in treatment group cities, compared with control group cities. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: New York City Police Department Body-Worn Cameras’ Effects on Civility and Lawfulness of Police–Citizen Encounters and Policing Activities |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Evidence, Community policing, Patrol, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | This program equips police with body cameras to record encounters with civilians. The program is rated No Effects. Camera use had no statistically significant effects on number of arrests, arrests with force, and summonses issued after 1 year. Officers wearing cameras had statistically significant reductions in complaints filed against them and made more stop reports. Camera use resulted in a statistically significantly reduced likelihood of lawful stops and frisks but fewer subjects searched. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Oklahoma's Juvenile Second Chance Act Reentry Program (Tulsa, OK) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Corrections, Juvenile recidivism prediction, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This is a juvenile reentry program that offers services to youth returning to the community in Tulsa, Okla., after their out-of-home placements. The goal of the program is to reduce rates of recidivism for high-risk youth. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction rates for treatment group youth who received the program’s services, compared with comparison group youth who did not receive services. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Detention Diversion Advocacy Program (DDAP) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Violent offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Case processing, Juvenile detention | This is a program that aims to divert youths charged with serious offenses from detention, with an overall goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Comparison group participants were more likely than treatment group participants to recidivate and to recidivate for a felony charge. Comparison group participants had a higher average number than treatment group participants of referrals and felony referrals. All differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Hot Spots Policing Program (Programa de Alta Dedicación Operativa) (PADO) (Montevideo, Uruguay) |
|
Robbery, Databases, Patrol, Policing strategies, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Problem-oriented policing | The program involved the use of hot-spots policing tactics in certain neighborhoods of Montevideo to reduce incidents of robbery. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control group hot-spot areas, treatment group hot-spot areas that received increased police presence (in the form of foot patrol) experienced a statistically significant reduction in robbery. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Empathic Supervision Intervention for Probation or Parole Officers |
|
Training, Parole, Probation, Computers, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention | The brief intervention targeted probation and parole officers’ mindsets about adults on probation or parole. Its goal was to reduce rates of recidivism and violations among adults on probation or parole by promoting empathic perspectives among officers. The program is rated Promising. Recidivism rates were significantly lower for the treatment condition compared with the control condition, but the intervention did not significantly affect violations. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Tulsa (Oklahoma) Community-Based Crime Reduction Initiative |
|
Burglary, Assault, Community policing, Patrol, Environmental design, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement | This is a police-driven, collaborative, place-based crime-reduction approach focused on a target neighborhood in Tulsa, Okla. The program is rated Promising. The initiative resulted in statistically significant reductions in total crime in both areas of the target neighborhood at the two post-intervention periods and a statistically significant reduction in burglary in one area. There were no statistically significant reductions in disorderly offenses and mixed results on the number of assaults. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Early Intervention Diversion Program (EIDP) (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice | The program is an alternative to formal processing in the juvenile justice system. The overall goal is to reduce the number of youths entering the juvenile justice system, while also reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Youths in the treatment group who participated in the diversion program had statistically significantly fewer rearrests, compared with youths in the comparison group who did not participate in the intervention. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Rockford (Ill.) Area Violence Elimination Network (RAVEN) |
|
Gun violence, Parole, Problem-oriented policing, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Violent crime, Policing strategies, Sanctions, Arrests | This is a parole-based, focused deterrence intervention. The goal of the program is to reduce community-level firearm violence. The program is rated Effective. The intervention was associated with statistically significant reductions in measures of total gun violence, total non-gun violence, and total violence, compared with the synthetic control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Use of Restrictive Housing in Prison to Reduce Recidivism (New Jersey) |
|
Prisons, Crime prevention | This intervention involves the removal of incarcerated individuals from the general prison population. The program is rated No Effects. Individuals who were placed in restrictive housing in New Jersey prisons had statistically significantly more rearrests, reconvictions, and reincarcerations due to technical violations and recidivated faster, compared with individuals who did not experience restrictive housing. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition Program (Pa.) for First-Time DUI Offenses |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Criminal history records, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Corrections, Courts, Traffic laws, Law enforcement | The purpose of this program is to afford individuals who have committed a driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense the opportunity to avoid the stigma of a criminal conviction and criminal labeling by expunging criminal records pertaining to the DUI offense through a diversion program. The program is rated Promising. Those in the diversion program were statistically significantly less likely to be rearrested within 4 years of the final disposition. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Procedural Justice Checklist for Suspected Terrorists in a European Country |
|
Procedural justice, Crime prevention, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Terrorism, Violent crime | This is a procedural justice checklist for counterterrorism police officers working in ports of travel in a European country to use when questioning people suspected of terrorism. The program is rated Effective. People interviewed by officers using the checklist reported a statistically significantly greater view of distributive justice, effectiveness of police, obligation to obey the law, and willingness to cooperate with the police, compared with people interviewed by control group officers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Safe Neighborhoods (Tampa, FL) |
|
Gun violence, Databases, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Sentencing, Courts, Arrests | This initiative involves proactive policing, enhanced enforcement, sentences for individuals who repeatedly offend, and collaboration among multiple stakeholders. The program’s goal is to reduce violent crime and gun violence. The program is rated Promising. The implementation of the program led to a statistically significant reduction in violent crime in the treatment group relative to the control group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on the rate of gun crimes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Phoenix (Arizona) Police Department Crime Gun Intelligence Center |
|
Gun violence, Fusion Centers, Evidence, Databases, Crime prevention, Prosecution, Courts, Policing strategies | This is a collaborative law enforcement effort to collect, manage, and analyze crime gun evidence to identify serial shooters, disrupt criminal activity, and prevent future gun violence. The program is rated Promising. Posttest gun crime cases saw statistically significant increases in the likelihood of arrest, but no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of being charged or convicted, compared with cases in the pretest period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Better Reduction and Assessment of Violence (BRAVE) Intervention (the Netherlands) |
|
Intimate partner violence, Crime prevention | This was a system provider–level training for community mental health teams in the Netherlands to improve detection of and response to domestic violence and abuse in patients with mental illness. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of detection or referral of current domestic violence and abuse for teams that received the intervention, compared with control teams that did not receive training, at the 12-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Daily Automated Telephony With a Brief Cognitive Intervention for Persons on Parole (Sweden) |
|
Parole, Cell Phones, Mental health, Alcohol, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Legal substances, Drugs | This was an automated telephony program designed for those recently paroled in Sweden that provided immediate feedback to participants and sent daily reports to their parole officers. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly less alcohol use, drug use, and internalizing behaviors at the 1-month follow-up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Florida Postrelease Supervision |
|
Parole, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This intervention involves individuals under any form of supervision after release from incarceration in the state of Florida, with the goal of reducing their risks of recidivism. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant decreases in rearrest and reconviction rates for individuals under supervision, compared with those who did not receive supervision, at the 3-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Resilience, Opportunity, Safety, Education, Strength (ROSES) |
|
Girls, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Truancy, Trauma, Case Management, Treatment, Diversion, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare | This is a community-based, trauma-informed, gender-responsive advocacy intervention for girls 11 to 17 years old who are at risk for or already involved in the juvenile justice system. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group girls were less likely to engage in physical fights and minor status offending behavior (i.e., missing fewer days of school), compared with control group girls. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Arkansas Community Corrections Texting Protocol |
|
Parole, Probation | This program sends text-message reminders to clients under community supervision to help reduce missed probation and parole appointments. The program is rated Promising. Clients who received reminders 1 day before the appointment and those who received two texts before the appointment were statistically significantly less likely to cancel or not attend appointments. There was no statistically significant effect for clients receiving text reminders 2 days before the appointment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Place Management for System-Trespassing Behaviors in a Cyber Environment |
|
Computers, Environmental design | This program used banners indicating that a cyber infrastructure was cared for and supervised to reduce crime in the cyber environment. The program is rated Promising. During a 90-day period, the treatment condition had statistically significant reductions in user activities during system trespassing sessions and the average number of commands typed into the attacked computer, and in the likelihood of system trespassers returning to the hacked environment, compared with a control condition. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Gender-Specific Drug Treatment Court (Midwestern State) |
|
Probation, Drug courts, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a drug court program that provides treatment services to women on probation to reduce their risk of reoffending. The program gives preference to women who have higher need and risk profiles, are mothers, and have substance use problems. The program is rated Promising. Women in the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to have a new conviction, compared with similar women on probation who did not participate in the program, at the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Milwaukee (Wis.) County Diversion Program |
|
Prosecution, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts | This is a prosecutor-led pretrial diversion program to rehabilitate individuals with misdemeanor or felony offenses who are at low risk of reoffending. The program is rated Effective. There were statistically significant reductions in the rearrest rate, days to rearrest, and cases dismissed for treatment group individuals, compared with comparison group individuals, at the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Milwaukee County (Wis.) Deferred Prosecution Program |
|
Prosecution, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Diversion | This is a prosecutor-led pretrial diversion program to rehabilitate individuals convicted of misdemeanor or felony offenses who are at medium risk of reoffending. The program is rated No Effects. There were statistically significant reductions in cases dismissed for treatment group individuals, compared with control group individuals. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the 2-year rearrest rate or days to first rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Police Substation Within a Business Improvement District in Newark, New Jersey |
|
Burglary, Motor vehicle theft, Assault, Robbery, Community policing, Patrol, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Property crime, Larceny/theft, Violent crime | This is a police substation operating within a business improvement district in Newark (N.J.) with the goal of reducing crime in the target area. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in burglary and motor vehicle theft in the treated area compared with a control area over the entire 6-year postintervention period. There were no statistically significant differences in robbery, aggravated assault, or theft from auto. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Philadelphia (Pa.) Predictive Policing Experiment (3PE) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Motor vehicle theft, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Robbery, Vehicles, Patrol, Environmental design, Policing strategies, Property crime, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Law enforcement operations | This strategy sought to reduce crime in Philadelphia by testing three different patrol strategies. The program is rated No Effects. Relative to control areas, there was no statistically significant difference in violent or property crimes in areas using one of two of the patrol strategies. Property crimes in an area using one of the strategies saw a statistically significant decrease, while there was a statistically significant increase in violent crime in areas using two of the strategies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras for Intimate-Partner Violence Cases (Phoenix, Ariz.) |
|
Evidence, Sensors/Surveillance, Community policing, Crime prevention, Prosecution, Courts, Sentencing, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Arrests, Equipment and technology | This program equips police with on-officer cameras to record contacts with civilians during intimate-partner violence incidents. The program is rated Promising. Camera use was statistically significantly more likely to result in arrests, charges filed, cases furthered, and both guilty pleas and verdicts. There was no statistically significant difference in sentence length. However, there was a statistically significantly greater reduction in case processing time in cases not involving a camera. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Phoenix, Arizona) |
|
Evidence, Sensors/Surveillance, Community policing, Crime prevention, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | This program equips police with on-officer cameras to record contacts with civilians. The program is rated Promising. Body-worn camera use resulted in statistically significant decreases in citizen complaints, and there were mixed results regarding camera use on arrest rates. There were no statistically significant differences in citizen resistance. There was a statistically significant increase in use of force, and less proactive, officer-initiated contact. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Vacant Lot Greening Program |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Gun violence, Robbery, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Property crime, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Assault, Gun violence, Violent crime, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This was an intervention to reduce crime and delinquency in urban areas by remediating vacant land. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control area, treatment areas experienced statistically significant reductions in gun assaults, burglary, nuisances, shootings (overall and per kilometer), and all crimes overall. However, the intervention showed mixed results with regard to drug offense rates and no statistically significant effect on robbery/theft rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Impact of California’s Proposition 47 (The Reduced Penalties for Some Crimes Initiative) on Recidivism |
|
Mental health, Sentencing guidelines, Drug possession, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Drugs, Drug abuse prevention and education, Crime prevention | This is a policy reform passed by California voters to downgrade drug and property offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, to focus prison resources on the most-serious violent offenses, reinvest savings toward prevention, and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. In an evaluation of recidivism, the intervention group had statistically significantly fewer rearrests and reconvictions for any crime or revocation, compared with the control group, at the 1-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Impact of Statewide Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Fatalities in the United States |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Vehicles, Crime prevention, Traffic accidents, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a drunk driving prevention initiative that seeks to reduce alcohol-involved crash fatalities by requiring the installation of ignition interlock devices on vehicles of all drivers convicted of driving under the influence. The program is rated Promising. Intervention states with a statewide ignition interlock requirement had a 15 percent decrease in alcohol-involved vehicle crash fatalities, compared with control states. This was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: IMpower Program for American Indian Girls |
|
Tribal youth, Dating violence, School climate, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Victimization, Tribal, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | This was a sexual assault prevention program adapted for American Indian girls that sought to reduce sexual assault victimization and to improve sexual assault resistance skills and self-defense knowledge. The program is rated Promising. Girls who received the intervention reported statistically significantly lower rates of sexual assault and sexual harassment, compared with girls in the comparison group. However, there was no impact on reported rates of physical dating violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP) (Outagamie County, Wisconsin) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Probation, Victim impact panels, Alcohol, Sensors/Surveillance, Vehicles, Crime prevention | This program combines deterrence and rehabilitation methods to reduce recidivism of persons convicted of operating while intoxicated (OWI) offenses. Services include intensive supervision, educational programming, and treatment options. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significantly fewer convictions, incarcerations, and subsequent days incarcerated, compared with the comparison group. There were no statistically significant differences in OWI recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Tact, Tactics, and Trust (T3) Training Program |
|
Training, Community policing, Procedural justice, Arrests, Law enforcement | This is a police training to develop officers’ decision-making, de-escalation, empathy, rapport-building, and self-control skills to discourage use of force in interactions with citizens. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant increase in procedural justice priorities posttraining in the treatment group, compared with the control group, but there were no statistically significant effects on maintaining self-control, physical control priorities, or use of force. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: iMentor’s College Ready Program |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This mentoring program for urban high school students is designed to improve college readiness. The program is rated No Effects. Compared with comparison students, treatment students were more likely to graduate and reported higher self-advocacy and critical thinking. These differences were statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in attending college, taking AP courses, task persistence, sitting in on college courses, seeking help, or growth mindset. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Chance UK |
|
Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program in which children (ages 5–11) meet weekly over 12 months with an adult volunteer. Mentors engage in structured activities to help reduce behavior and emotional problems in children by developing self-esteem, self-efficacy, social skills, and future aspirations. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in parent- and teacher-rated problem or prosocial behavior or in child self-esteem or goals. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Routine Inquiry About Violence Victimization and Follow-Up Support (Sweden) |
|
Girls, Treatment, Victims of crime, Violent crime, Intimate partner violence, Rape and sexual assault | This is a program for young women in nonemergency health centers in Sweden. It involves routine inquiry about their experiences with violence victimization and offers empowerment strategies for victimized women. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in self-reported measures of physical violence, sexual violence (touch or penetration), and emotional violence at the 12-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Community-Oriented Policing in New Haven (Conn.) |
|
Training, Community policing, Procedural justice | This is a brief policing intervention for improving public attitudes toward police, through positive nonenforcement police contact. The program is rated Promising. Compared with control residents, intervention household residents reported statistically significant improvements in attitudes toward police and more positive perceptions of police performance and legitimacy and greater willingness to cooperate with police. But there was no statistically significant effect on compliance with police. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Milwaukee’s (Wis.) Closed-Circuit Television Camera Program |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Motor vehicle theft, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Robbery, Sensors/Surveillance, Surveillance, Environmental design, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), Arrests, Equipment and technology | This is a police-operated public surveillance program that seeks to reduce crime and increase crime clearances (i.e., arrests) by installing new closed-circuit television cameras at high-crime, high-traffic intersections in Milwaukee (Wis.). The program is rated Promising. Intersections in intervention areas where new cameras were installed had a statistically significant higher rate of crime clearances for all crime types, compared with intersections in comparison areas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Happy Families (Thailand) |
|
Children exposed to violence, Coping, Trauma, Mental health | This was a parenting and family skills intervention for displaced Burmese migrant families in Thailand. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant impact on child externalizing problems, family cohesion, family communication and positive parent-child interactions in the treatment group, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant effect on child attention problems, or child internalizing problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Expanded Early Pathways for Young Traumatized Children |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma | This is an at-home parent and child therapy program for young children with behavioral and emotional problems who have experienced trauma and live in poverty. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group children had statistically significant reductions in challenging behaviors and anxious/withdrawn and fearful symptoms of trauma, compared with children on a waitlist. The quality of caregiver–child relationships also had statistically significant improved. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Motivational Interviewing (MI) Training for Parole Officers in Colorado |
|
Training, Parole, Community corrections, Probation, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a client-centered counseling approach implemented as a job-training intervention for parole officers in Colorado. The intervention seeks to enhance parole officers’ communication skills to promote motivation for change and reduce recidivism among supervised people on probation. The program is rated Promising. People on probation in the intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism outcomes, compared with people on probation in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Web-Based Sexual Assault Risk Reduction (SARR) for College Women |
|
Situational crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Campus, Campus Crime, Schools, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a program for college women who engaged in heavy episodic drinking to provide feedback on their risk perception and resistance to reduce sexual assault. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants did not statistically significantly differ from those in the control group on measures of incapacitated attempted/completed rape frequency, alcohol-related sexual assault incidents/severity, or use of sexual assault protective behavioral strategies at the 3-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Swift and Sure Sanctions Probation Program (Michigan) |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an alternative-to-incarceration program designed to respond swiftly with sanctions to probation violations of those at high-risk of re-offending. The overall goal is to reduce participants’ recidivism rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant reduction in recidivism rates (overall, misdemeanor, felony, property, drug/alcohol, and other) compared with the comparison group, but there was no statistically significant effects on violent recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Incredible Years BASIC–Parent Training Program |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Positive youth development | This parent-training program seeks to improve parenting competencies of families with children (ages 3–8) at risk of a disruptive conduct behavior/disorder. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group parents showed a statistically significant increase in use of appropriate discipline practices and reported fewer child conduct behavior problems, compared with comparison group parents, but there was no statistically significant effect on other child outcomes, such as prosocial behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Safe and Successful Youth Initiative (SSYI) (Massachusetts) |
|
Gang Crime, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Jobs and workforce development, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Gangs | This secondary violence prevention program targets young men most likely to commit or be victim of gang or gun crime to reduce their incarceration and victimization from violent crime. The program is rated Promising. SSYI youths were statistically significantly less likely to be incarcerated compared with comparison group youths. SSYI–funded cities had statistically significant reductions in all measured city-level crime victimization rates, compared with comparison cities. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Community Reporting Engagement Support and Training (CREST) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is an enhanced day reporting center designed to reduce the risk of recidivism in people on probation with mental illnesses. It provides services such as substance abuse treatment and crisis intervention. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group individuals had a statistically significantly lower risk of conviction for any offense, compared with control group participants on standard probation. However, there was no statistically significant effect on the risk of conviction for a felo Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive Life Skills (CLS) |
|
Parole, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a cognitive–behavioral intervention that seeks to reduce recidivism in people leaving secure confinement by addressing antisocial attitudes and decisionmaking. The program is designed for adult medium- and high-risk individuals. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group people were statistically significantly less likely to recidivate, compared with control group participants, during parole supervision. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Nurturing Families Network (NFN) Home-Visiting Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention | This is a home-visiting program for first-time mothers in high-risk families that promotes positive parenting to prevent child maltreatment and out-of-home placements. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group families had a statistically significant lower number of substantiated child maltreatment and neglect cases, compared with the comparison group, but there was no statistically significant effect on out-of-home placements, and substantiated physical abuse. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: GEAR UP – Academic Mentoring in Mathematics |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based mentoring program for low-income high school students designed to increase academic achievement and college attendance and success. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant increase in receiving a C grade or above in algebra I and in scores on a standardized state math exam, compared with the comparison group. However, there was not a statistically significant difference between groups in receiving a C grade or above in geometry. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Responsive Aggression Regulation Therapy (Netherlands) |
|
Mental health, Violent offenders, Treatment, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile delinquency, Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a responsive intervention that seeks to reduce severe aggressive behaviors of incarcerated youth at a juvenile justice institution in the Netherlands. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group youth, compared with treatment-as-usual group youth, had statistically significant higher aggression-related skills, lower cognitive distortions (such as how youth think about aggression), and a lower recidivism risk for violent and general offenses at the 3-year follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: One Summer Plus–Jobs Only (Chicago, Ill.) |
|
Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Property crime, Crime prevention, Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Employment initiatives, Violent crime | This is a summer jobs program in Chicago, Ill., which seeks to reduce youth violence by providing high-risk students (grades 8–12) with part-time summer employment and access to an adult job mentor. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment group and the control group in violent crime arrests, property crime arrests, drug arrests, or other arrests. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Eye to Eye |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mental health, Juvenile delinquency | This is a group-mentoring afterschool program in which elementary and middle school students with the diagnosis of a learning disability (LD) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) meet with high school or college student mentors who also have LD/ADHD, to discuss and address their strengths and challenges. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to be associated with statistically significant decreases in depression and increases in self-esteem over the program period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cooperative Learning |
|
Schools, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Drugs | This is a group-based learning approach that seeks to enhance peer relations by increasing opportunities for positive social integration between adolescents. The program is rated Promising. Students in intervention schools reported they were less willing to use alcohol, had fewer deviant peer affiliations, lower perceived student stress and emotional problems, and had higher academic engagement, compared with students in control schools. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Mentoring Program for Youth-Headed Households in Rwanda |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program that uses volunteer community members to strengthen the supportive environment and improve psychosocial outcomes among youth living without an adult caregiver in rural Rwanda. The program is rated Promising. Youth in the intervention group showed statistically significant greater improvements in scores for depression, grief, marginalization, and adult support at 18 months, compared with the youth in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Bronx Defenders Holistic Defense Model (New York) |
|
Defendants, Indigent defense, Defense, Jails, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Sentencing, Courts | This is a program that uses an interdisciplinary team to address factors contributing to clients’ contact with the court. The program is rated Promising. Participants experienced a reduction in average sentence length and were more likely to be released on recognizance, compared with those who received traditional legal services. These differences were statistically significant. However, there was no statistically significant impact on conviction or on future arrest rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Reducing Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limits for Motor Vehicle Operations (New Jersey) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program comprises legislation that was passed to reduce alcohol-related crash fatalities by lowering the blood alcohol concentration limit for adult drivers from 0.10 to 0.08. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant reduction in passenger fatalities per crash after the implementation of the legislation; however, there were no statistically significant impacts on driver fatalities per crash or total fatalities per crash. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Mystery Shop Programs to Reduce Underage Alcohol Sales |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Situational crime prevention, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention seeks to increase staff ID checks for the sale of alcoholic beverages at licensed establishments, to help prevent sales to minors. The program is rated Effective. The results were mixed. One study found there was a statistically significant increase in age verification rates resulting from the intervention, whereas a second study found no statistically significant increases in ID-checking rates. Overall, the results suggest the intervention influenced ID-checking rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Children’s Advocacy Center Model |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Case Management, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is a multidisciplinary, victim-focused approach designed to improve forensic interviewing and the continuity of care for youth who are victims of sexual abuse and assault. The program is rated Effective. The program showed a statistically significant increase in the receipt of physical health examinations and counseling referrals for treatment group youth, compared with youth in the community comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Text Message Reminder Nudge for Defendants (Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, United Kingdom) |
|
This is a text-messaging program designed to remind defendants about upcoming court dates. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control group defendants in attendance at their first scheduled court hearing and in the number of failure-to-appear warrants issued. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||
Program Profile: Prev@cib Program (Spain) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Campus Crime, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is an anti-bullying program for adolescents in Spain, which is designed to decrease bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization both in the classroom and virtual environments. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in bullying and victimization and cyberbullying and cybervictimization for the treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Substance Use Prevention Promoted by Eating Family Meals Regularly (SUPPER) Project |
|
Substance abuse, Marijuana, Drugs | This program seeks to help parents become facilitators in preventing children’s substance misuse, by encouraging them to have five or more family meals together weekly. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group parents showed a statistically significant increase in talking with children about alcohol, compared with control group parents, but there were no statistically significant differences in number of family meals per week and talking with children about marijuana and other drugs. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: TakeCARE |
|
Dating violence, Campus Crime, School climate, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an online video program that seeks to promote and increase high school and college students’ efficacy in performing helpful bystander behavior in instances of relationship or sexual violence, to reduce sexual violence among young adults and adolescents. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed statistically significant increases in observed and self-reported bystander behavior and in efficacy to intervene, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Responder Program for Men (Ontario, Canada) |
|
Crime prevention, Intimate partner violence, Assault | This is a program for moderate- and high-risk males accused of assaulting their intimate partners. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the comparison group, program participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being charged with any new domestic, property, or administrative offense and of having contact with the police. There was no statistically significant difference between groups on likelihood of being charged with a new violent offense. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: P3i Application for Use by Law Enforcement Officers (Lincoln, Nebraska) |
|
Computers, Sensors/Surveillance, Databases, Warrants, Patrol, Internet, Vehicles, Arrests | This was a mobile application for law enforcement officers that projected the locations of persons-of-interest based on their residences and other location information contained in the police department’s crime database. The program is rated Promising. Officers using the application had a statistically significant greater number of warrant arrests and information reports than officers in the control group. There was no statistically significant impact on citation arrests. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ceasefire (Oakland, Calif.) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a focused-deterrence group violence reduction strategy (GVRS) designed to reduce or control gun violence in Oakland, Calif. The program is rated Effective. The intervention was shown to reduce total shootings, gang-involved shootings, suspected gang-involved shootings, and gang shooting victimizations in treatment block groups relative to matched comparison block groups. These differences were all statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bottom Line |
|
Youth development, Schools, Mentoring, Young adults (18-24) | This is a college counseling program that promotes 4-year college enrollment and completion for low-income, first-generation students. The program is rated Promising. Participants in each of two cohorts had a statistically significant greater likelihood of enrolling in a 4-year college or any college, compared with the control group. In one cohort, participants were also enrolled in more total semesters and more likely to be continuously enrolled in college, compared with control students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Hot Spots Policing Experiment (Louisville, Ky.) |
|
Problem-oriented policing, Law enforcement, Policing strategies, Patrol, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This was an experiment designed to evaluate the effectiveness of hot spots policing in urban and suburban areas. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control hot spots in part 1 crimes, part 2 crimes, and crime-related calls for service. However, results showed a statistically significant reduction in crime-related calls for service in urban locations relative to suburban locations. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Operation Regional Analytics for the Safety of Our Residents (RASOR) |
|
Problem-oriented policing, Drugs, Substance abuse | This was a modified focused deterrence program that targeted high-risk persons in Massachusetts. The program aimed to increase their risks of getting caught and convicted while providing them with regular meetings with a case management team and a variety of services such as substance abuse treatment. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment group and the control group in time-to-arraignment at the 1-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Anti-Theft Wraps |
|
Larceny/theft, Situational crime prevention | This is a crime prevention technique designed to deter retail theft by wrapping products in a security wire wrap. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group stores that received the intervention experienced a statistically significant drop in the loss of cordless electric drills, compared with control group stores. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the loss of diet supplements or skincare products. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Creating Lasting Family Connections Fatherhood Program: Family Reintegration |
|
Reentry, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Drugs | This is a community-based program for adult males who received substance abuse treatment while incarcerated and are reentering the community. The goals are to reduce recidivism, substance abuse, and HIV/hepatitis infection rates, and promote fatherhood and relationship skills. This program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating and demonstrated an increase in relationship skills, compared with the comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Make Parenting A Pleasure |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development | This prevention program seeks to build parenting skills and provide support to parents of young children, to reduce the likelihood of negative lifelong impacts on children’s physical, mental, and emotional health. The program is rated Promising. The program participants showed statistically significant improvements in parenting skills, knowledge of child development and behavior, and reduced parental depression, but not in family functioning, social support, nurturing, and parental stress. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Crossover Youth Practice Model |
|
Family courts, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Children exposed to violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a model that uses a conceptual plan and organizational framework to strengthen collaborations between child welfare and juvenile justice system professionals and partners to prevent or reduce youths’ involvement in the juvenile justice system or related systems of care. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism rates, compared with youth in the comparison groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Citizen Schools Extended Learning Time Model |
|
Youth development, Afterschool, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mentoring | This is an afterschool program that prepares middle school students for academic and social success. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed statistically significant higher rates of attendance and a greater likelihood of being on track to graduate and passing 12th grade English/language arts (ELA) than nonparticipants. Groups did not differ in ELA or math test scores, 12th grade suspensions, passing ELA and math comprehensive tests, or on-time promotion to 12th grade. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Olweus Bullying Prevention Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, School violence, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide, multicomponent intervention to reduce and prevent aggression and bullying among students. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant intervention effect on teachers’ ratings of students’ physical, verbal, and relational aggression and victimization. However, there was no statistically significant intervention effect on students’ self-reports of physical and relational aggression and victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: EVOLVE: Court-Mandated Program for Serious Male Batterers |
|
Probation, Courts, Intimate partner violence, Crime prevention | This is a court-mandated, post-conviction intervention for males at high-risk for perpetrating family violence. The program is designed to decrease family violence through cognitive–behavioral approaches. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant lower likelihood of arrest for any offense for participants, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences found between the groups in family violence arrests. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Situational Theft Prevention on a University Campus |
|
Larceny/theft, Situational crime prevention, Campus, Campus Crime, Schools | This program used a randomized experimental design to test the effects of a situational theft prevention strategy to reduce the theft of property (i.e., dry erase markers labeled with an anti-theft message) from classrooms at a university in Louisiana. The program is rated Promising. Treatment classrooms with labeled markers had a statistically significant lower likelihood of having the markers removed, compared with control classrooms that received markers without the message. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project Arrive |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based group mentoring program that seeks to improve academic performance and promote resilience against criminal involvement for ninth graders at risk of dropping out. The program is rated No Effects. While there were statistically significant increases in problem solving and prosocial peers for the intervention group, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention and comparison students in juvenile offenses, empathy, and perceptions of home support. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Strength at Home Couples (SAH-C) Program to Prevent Military Partner Violence |
|
Military personnel, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a cognitive–behavioral, trauma-informed group intervention that is designed to prevent relationship conflict and intimate partner violence (IPV) among military couples. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in physical and psychological IPV for the treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Meditation for Female Trauma IPV Survivors with Co-Occurring Disorders |
|
Dating violence, Mental health, Coping, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime | This is a therapeutic program that used meditation to improve mental health outcomes for female survivors of interpersonal violence with co-occurring disorders. The program is rated Promising. Women in the treatment group who participated in the meditation curriculum had a statistically significant fewer number of mental health and trauma symptoms, and a higher level of reliable change in mental health and trauma symptoms, compared with women in the control group who received services as usual. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SafeCare© |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Child protection | This is a home-visitation program that aims to prevent and address factors associated with child abuse and neglect. The program is rated Promising. Parents in the SafeCare group demonstrated statistically significant decreases in depression symptoms and risk of child protective services recidivism, compared with parents in the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of child physical abuse among a sample of American Indian parents. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances | This program assessed the impact of a nonmanualized family-based treatment approach for adolescent behavior problems. The program is rated No Effects. Results indicated that the treatment group experienced statistically significant reductions in adolescent-reported externalizing and internalizing behaviors. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in caregiver-reported externalizing and internalizing behaviors or in adolescent-reported alcohol or drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Real Talk Dating Abuse Intervention |
|
Dating violence, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is a dating abuse intervention for youth, ages 15-19, which uses motivational interviewing with the goal of changing self-reported dating abuse perpetration. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found between the intervention and control groups in any self-reported dating abuse perpetration, including physical, sexual, psychological, and cyber abuse, at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Harlem (NY) Parole Reentry Court |
|
Parole, Probation, Reentry courts, Prisons, Corrections, Specialty/problem-solving courts, Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs | This is a reentry program designed to assist parolees transition from life in prison to life in the community. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in rates of reconvictions and parole revocations, increases in numbers of months employed, and a greater likelihood of receiving a high school diploma or GED, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in rate of rearrests or substance use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Emotional and Behavioral Health Crisis Response and Prevention (EBH-CRP) |
|
Bullying, Mental health, School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Crisis response, Victims of crime | The program aims to increase school/community competence in responding to and preventing student emotional and behavioral health crises. This program is rated Promising. Compared with control schools, intervention schools had statistically significantly lower rates of suspensions and office referrals and had conducted more threat assessments and crisis interventions. However, there were no significant effects on bullying, juvenile justice referrals, and emotional or behavioral health incidents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) |
|
Drug testing, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention | This is a community supervision strategy that includes swift, certain, and fair responses to probation violations. The program is rated No Effects. The treatment group had a statistically significant lower likelihood of having a positive drug test at the 12-month follow-up, but a statistically significant greater number of probation violations, compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant effects on recidivism (any arrest) or new convictions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Targeted RECLAIM (Ohio) |
|
Diversion, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Civil courts, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a diversion program intended to reduce juvenile recidivism by treating youths in the community in place of incarceration. This program is rated as Promising. Youths in the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to be incarcerated during the 1-year follow-up, compared with youths in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Evaluative Conditioning for Adolescent at Risk for Violence (South Korea) |
|
Treatment, Juvenile (under 18) | This program used conditioning methods to change the way at-risk adolescents implicitly think about violence. The goal was to train participants to associate violence with negative, instead of positive, objects or ideas. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received evaluative conditioning demonstrated a statistically significant increase in negative implicit attitudes toward violence, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Functional Family Therapy-Child Welfare (FFT-CW®) |
|
Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This adapted version of Functional Family Therapy is designed to improve functioning for child welfare-involved families. This program is rated Promising. Treatment families showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of achieving all treatment goals and a lower likelihood of being referred to another program at case closing, compared with control families. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in out-of-home placements. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Veterans Moving Forward (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to assist incarcerated male veterans of the U.S. military by providing them with in-custody treatment, services, and linkage to rehabilitative programming and community resources and reduce their chances of recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism for program participants during the 12-month follow-up period, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prison Visitation (Minnesota) |
|
Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention | Prison visitation allows individuals housed in Minnesota facilities to be visited by family, friends, and other approved persons. The program is rated Promising. Individuals visited at least once during their confinement had statistically significant lower risks of reconvictions and technical violation revocations compared with those who were never visited. Those who were visited specifically by community volunteers also had statistically significantly lower risks of recidivism compared with the Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Group Conferencing in Child Welfare (Netherlands) |
|
Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system | This program used a decision-making model to help families involved in the child welfare system to create a care plan. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found in child safety, child maltreatment, length of welfare involvement, or imposed supervision orders. The treatment group reported a statistically significant higher level of perceived social support; however, the treatment group also had a higher percentage of out-of-home placements. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Unification Program (Chicago, Ill.) |
|
Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Intimate partner violence | This program is designed to stabilize families at risk for parent-child separation by addressing housing needs. The program is rated Effective. There was a statistically significant positive effect on rate of placement in foster care for treatment group children, meaning treatment group children were placed in foster care at a slower rate, compared with control group children. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Finding |
|
Family courts, Children exposed to violence, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to find and engage kin and fictive kin to support the needs of foster care youth. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant greater number of kin and fictive kin found and positive attachment figures identified for the intervention group, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no significant difference in proportion of relative placements to total placements, reunification rates, or externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: My Life Mentoring |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools, Juvenile delinquency prevention | This individual and group mentoring intervention was designed to improve transition outcomes for foster youth by increasing their self-determination skills. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between program participants and the comparison group in number of arrests or convictions, charge severity, range of punitive system involvement, comprehensive criminal justice involvement, delinquency, dropping out of high school, or homelessness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Centered Treatment |
|
Home visiting, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention | This is a short-term, family-based program, which is designed to reduce out-of-home placements for juvenile justice-involved youth. The program is rated Promising. Youth who received Family Centered Treatment were less likely to experience future conviction or incarceration in either the juvenile or adult justice systems, compared with youth who were placed in a group home. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Be BOLD Yoga for High-Risk Adolescents |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Juvenile health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Dropout/expulsion, Alternative schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a mindfulness-based yoga program intended to reduce substance use (and the subsequent negative effects of use) for adolescents at high risk of dropping out of school. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in measures of substance use, self-regulation, mood, mindfulness, or coping skills for youth who participated in the program, compared with the control group youth. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Couples Coping Enhancement Training (Switzerland) |
|
This is a marital distress-prevention program designed to encourage positive parenting by teaching couples how to cope with stress. This program is rated Promising. Participating couples reported statistically significant improvements in their perception of the quality of the relationship, coping with stress as a couple, and communication, compared with control group couples, at the 1-year follow up. However, there were no significant differences between groups in improving parenting. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||
Program Profile: After Deployment, Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT) |
|
Mental health | This is a behavioral parent-training program designed specifically for military families with school-aged children. The program is rated No Effects. ADAPT children reported fewer school problems and ADAPT parents demonstrated more positive involvement and problem-solving skills, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in measures of child loneliness and adaptive skills, parental discipline, skill encouragement, or monitoring. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Arches Transformative Mentoring Program |
|
Diversion, Violent offenders, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare | This is a group mentoring program that seeks to reduce recidivism of youth on probation in New York City, using an interactive journaling curriculum based on cognitive-behavioral principles. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant reduction in felony reconvictions, compared with comparison group youth at 24 months; however, there were no statistically significant differences on arrests, felony arrests, or reconvictions. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP) |
|
Diversion, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice | This is an intervention designed to prevent future criminal activity among system-involved youth through using short-term, high-intensity relationships with paid mentors, referred to as Advocates. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed statistically significant improvement in educational engagement and reductions in serious dispositions, compared with a comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Helping One Student To Succeed (HOSTS) Program |
|
Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile delinquency | This is a structured, one-on-one tutoring and mentoring intervention that was designed to improve language arts skills among low-achieving students in kindergarten through 12th grade. The program is rated Promising. Students in the intervention group showed a statistically significant increase in their reading comprehension and overall reading quotient scores, compared with students in the comparison group. However, there were no significant differences in reading fluency scores. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Protecting Strong African American Families (ProSAAF) |
|
Substance abuse, Youth development, Home visiting, Positive youth development | The program is designed to improve family functioning and enhance youth development by targeting parents’ relationships and parenting skills. The program is rated Effective. For the intervention group, there were statistically significant increases in levels of parental monitoring and positive self-concept, as well as statistically significant decreases in conduct problems and substance use initiation. There were no significant effects for racial pride socialization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Availability, Responsiveness and Continuity (ARC) |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to enhance system effectiveness and organization, to improve client outcomes for child welfare and mental health agencies. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in problem behaviors for youth who were served by agencies that received the intervention, compared with youth who were served by control agencies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Early Pathways |
|
Mental health, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a home-based, parent-and-child therapy program for the treatment of disruptive behaviors (such as physical aggression and oppositional behaviors) in toddlers and preschoolers who are living in poverty. The program is rated Promising. Compared to the control group, there were statistically significant positive effects found for improving children’s prosocial and challenging behaviors, parent and child play, and the discipline and nurturing behavior of caregivers. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Massachusetts Child Trauma Project (MCTP) |
|
Children exposed to violence, Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Gun violence | This program was designed to improve well-being and permanency outcomes for children with complex trauma in state care. The program is rated No Effects. Overall, findings were mixed. There were statistically significant findings favoring the treatment group, including increased likelihood of adoption; however, there were also statistically significant findings favoring the control group. Overall, the preponderance of evidence suggests the program did not have the intended effects on children. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) Treatment for Girls |
|
Girls, Mental health, Positive youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile detention | The program is a cognitive–behavioral, anger management treatment for adolescent girls in residential juvenile justice facilities, which is designed to reduce participants’ anger, physical aggression, and relational aggression. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed statistically significant reductions in anger, physical aggression, and relational aggression scores, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Strength at Home Men's Program (SAH-M) |
|
Military personnel, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This program is a cognitive-behavioral, trauma-informed group therapy program for active-duty or former military personnel who have engaged in recent physical intimate partner violence (IPV). The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in physical and psychological IPV for the SAH-M treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Parenting Intervention to Prevent Early Conduct Problems and Improve Parenting Practices (New York City) |
|
Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is a family-based, group preventive intervention for preschool children who are at high risk for antisocial behavior. The program is rated Promising. The intervention had statistically significant effects on observed child physical aggression, responsive parenting, and stimulation for learning, but had no statistically significant effects on parent-rated child physical aggression or harsh parenting practices. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police-Led Community Initiative to Reduce Gun Violence (St. Louis, Missouri) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention | This police-led program was designed to reduce gun crime and serious violence in the Wells Goodfellow neighborhood in St. Louis, Missouri. The program is rated No Effects. The intervention did not have a statistically significant effect on gun violence or total violence trends in the target neighborhood compared with the average trends of seven matched comparison neighborhoods across the city. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Delaware CREST Outreach Centers |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Drugs | This is a residential work-release program that uses therapy, counseling and treatment for persons convicted of a crime with a history of substance use who are reentering society. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in participants being injection-free at 6 months and being drug-free after 3 years; however, there were no statistically significant effects in condom use (at 6 months) or being arrest-free (after 3 years). Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Delaware KEY Substance Abuse Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Mental health, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Drugs, Rape and sexual assault | This program is a prison-based therapeutic community for drug-involved individuals. The program is rated Promising. After 3 years, results showed statistically significant increases in remaining drug-free; however, there were no statistically significant effects in being arrest-free. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Using Absenteeism Information to "Nudge" Attendance (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
|
Truancy | This program uses a “nudge” postcard to reduce student absenteeism by increasing parents’ or guardians’ awareness of non-attendance. The postcard is designed to motivate them to encourage their children to improve attendance and academic performance. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in posttreatment absenteeism for the intervention group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Criando con Amor: Promoviendo Armonía y Superación (CAPAS) |
|
This program includes two versions of a culturally adapted parenting intervention for immigrant Latino populations. The program is rated Effective. Both versions of the intervention were found to have a statistically significant impact on improving parenting practices, compared with the control group. Only the enhanced intervention had a positive, statistically significant effect on child internalizing behaviors. Neither had a statistically significant effect on externalizing behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||
Program Profile: Second Chance Act (SCA) Adult Reentry Demonstration Programs |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Reentry courts, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives | This is a program designed to reduce recidivism and improve employment rates through reentry services for individuals who have a moderate-to-high risk for reoffending. The program is rated No Effects. At the 30-month follow up, there were no statistically significant differences in rearrest, reconviction, reincarceration, or employment rates between program participants and control group members. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Great Life Mentoring |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-on-one mentoring program in which youth referred from a community mental health agency receive support from adult volunteers with whom they spend 2 to 3 hours weekly on positive community activities. The program is rated Effective. The intervention was shown to be associated with a statistically significant increase in global functioning and a lower likelihood of an unplanned and client-initiated ending of treatment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Procedural Justice Training Program (Seattle Police Department) |
|
Training, Procedural justice, Arrests, Law enforcement | This program was designed to “slow down” police officers’ thought processes during encounters with citizens. The program is rated No Effects. At the 6-week follow-up, treatment group officers were statistically significantly less likely to be involved in an incident in which physical force was used, but there were no statistically significant differences on the fraction of incidents that resulted in an arrest, the number of citizen complaints filed against the officer, and other outcomes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Washington, D.C.) |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | Police body-worn cameras (BWCs) are designed to improve policing and the perceived legitimacy of the police and legal institutions. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in police use of force, number of citizen complaints, or number of arrests for disorderly conduct for police officers who wore BWCs, compared with officers who did not wear BWCs. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Power Source |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a group-based, cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness training intervention targeted at male youth in high-security correctional facilities. The program is rated Promising. Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in the decline of attention skills for the treatment group, measured as accuracy and response variability on the Attention Network Test; however, there was no statistically significant effect on response time. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Playworks Coach |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Recreation, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a program for low-income elementary schools that encourages healthy and meaningful play, delivered by trained coaches. Program components include recess activities, class game time, and after-school activities. This program is rated Promising. There was a small, statistically significant increase in attendance rates for students who participated in Playworks, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Rapid Intervention Community Court (Chittenden County, Vt.) |
|
Community courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Problem-solving courts, Diversion, Prosecution, Courts, Community courts, Intimate partner violence | This is a prosecutor-led diversion program for nonviolent defendants, which is designed to decrease the number of convictions and reduce recidivism while improving administrative efficiency and cost effectiveness. The program is rated No Effects. The program had a statistically significant effect on reducing the likelihood of conviction, but there was no statistically significant effect on recidivism for program participants, compared with comparison participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Body-Worn Cameras (Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department) |
|
Community policing, Patrol, Sensors/Surveillance, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Equipment and technology | The program is designed to reduce officer use-of-force incidents and citizen complaints by providing body-worn cameras to officers in the Las Vegas (Nevada) Metropolitan Police Department. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in police use-of-force and citizen complaints, and a statistically significant increase in arrests and citations for officers who wore the BWCs, compared with non-BWC control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Operation Night Light (ONL) (Midwest) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Probation, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Violent offenders, Home visiting, Case Management, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a home-visiting program for youth on probation who are considered at high risk of recidivism. The program is rated No Effects. Compared with the treatment group, the control group was more likely to have completed probation, less likely to have probation revoked due to a technical violation, and committed fewer new crimes during probation; however, they recidivated sooner. There were no differences in the probation revocations due to severity of a new crime. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Enough! Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in My School |
|
School safety, Schools, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an interactive, one-hour, online training course that educates school personnel on identifying, reporting, and preventing child sexual abuse (CSA). This program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant increase in knowledge about CSA for teachers who participated in the training, compared with teachers who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Text Message Reminders of Court Dates for Victims and Witnesses (Staffordshire, England) |
|
Witnesses, Victim notification, Victims of crime | This program was designed to reduce non-appearance rates by notifying victims or witnesses by text message 2 or 3 days before they were scheduled to appear in court. The message acts as a “nudge” to remind and encourage witnesses or victims to attend court. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in non-appearance rates for participants who received a text message reminder, compared with participants who did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Baloo and You (Germany) |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program for disadvantaged elementary school children that aims to enrich their social environment and enable their acquisition of new skills through an authentic relationship with a caring adult. This program was rated Promising. The findings show a statistically significant improvement in the prosocial behavior and likelihood of high-track attendance in school for the children assigned to the intervention, compared with children in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: CHAT (Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents At-Risk for Substance Use) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Legal substances | This program uses motivational interviewing in primary care settings for adolescents at-risk for substance use. This program is rated No Effects. Results suggest there were no statistically significant differences in alcohol or marijuana use between adolescents who participated in the program and those who did not; however, there was a statistically significant reduction in perceived peer use of alcohol and marijuana for program participants, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Special Protective Handling Procedures for High-Loss Products in Retail Stores |
|
Larceny/theft, Situational crime prevention, Crime prevention, Property crime | The program is designed to reduce theft and accidental loss of high-loss products by both increasing attention paid to the product and reducing general access to the product. This program is rated Promising. The program showed a statistically significant decrease in product loss in stores that used special protective handling procedures compared with stores that did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Display Fixtures for High-Loss Products in Retail Stores |
|
Larceny/theft, Situational crime prevention, Crime prevention, Property crime | The program is designed to reduce theft of high-loss products using protective display fixtures. By increasing the effort and time needed to execute a theft, this fixture increases the perceived risk of theft detection while reducing their perception of the potential rewards of stealing a product. This program is rated Promising. The program showed a statistically significant decrease in product loss in stores that used protective display fixtures compared with stores that did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Alcohol Literacy Challenge |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Campus, Schools, Child health and welfare, Drugs | This program consists of a single-session, group-delivered intervention for high school and college students, which is designed to alter alcohol expectancies and lower alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on modifying alcohol expectancy processes and reducing alcohol consumption in college students; however, there was no statistically significant impact on high school students. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Street Lighting in New York City Public Housing |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Motor vehicle theft, Regulatory offenses, Weapons violations, Assault, Carjacking, Gun violence, Homicide, Robbery, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Violent crime | This is a temporary outdoor street-lighting program designed to reduce nighttime crime in public housing developments experiencing elevated crime rates. The program is rated Promising. Installing additional light towers in treated developments resulted in statistically significant reductions in complaints of index crimes, felony crimes, assaults, homicides, and weapons crimes at night, compared with control developments. There were no statistically significant differences in misdemeanor crimes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Change A Life |
|
Children exposed to violence, Intimate partner violence, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | A free, interactive online program for adults designed to educate the public about the effects of childhood exposure to domestic violence (DV) and improve adults’ self-efficacy in helping children exposed to DV. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant increase in knowledge about DV exposure for both community and university samples, compared with the control groups. There was a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy for only the community sample. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: ParentCorps |
|
Mental health | This is an early childhood, family-centered, school-based intervention for children and their families in low-income communities. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant effects on children’s academic performance and mental health problems, but no effect on early conduct problems. There were also statistically significant effects on parents’ knowledge, positive behavior support, and parental involvement, but no effect on harsh and inconsistent behavior management. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Group Violence Reduction Strategy (Chicago, Ill.) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Surveillance, Problem-oriented policing | This is a focused deterrence intervention that uses a data-driven approach to reduce shootings in Chicago, IL by identifying persons who are responsible for a disproportionate share of shootings and delivering a “don’t shoot” message. The program is rated No Effects. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that the strategy had no impact on shooting behaviors in the year after the call-ins, but did have a statistically significant impact on the time until a shooting incident occurred. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Training: Competent Learners Achieving School Success (BEST in CLASS) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | A classroom-based intervention, delivered by teachers, designed to prevent emotional and behavioral disorders in high-risk children. The program is rated Effective. Intervention group children showed statistically significant improvement in behaviors, social and behavioral competence, and student-teacher relationships, compared with control group children. Intervention group teachers showed statistically significant improvements in instructional practices, compared with control group teachers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Tactical Police Responses to Micro-Time Hot Spots for Thefts from Vehicles and Residential Burglaries (Port St. Lucie, Florida) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Property crime, Crime prevention, Larceny/theft, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This program relies on hot spots policing strategies to prevent thefts from vehicles and residential burglaries in “micro-time” hot spots in Port St. Lucie, Florida. The program is rated Effective. There was a statistically significant reduction in thefts from vehicles and residential burglaries in micro-time hot spots that received tactical police responses, compared with micro-time hot spots that received police patrol as usual. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADTC) |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is a coordinated, component-based approach that allows for real-time adaptation of treatment to address the complex needs of clinically-referred, comorbid youths, whose problems and treatment needs can shift during treatment. The program is rated Promising. In examining MATCH-ADTC to usual care, there were mixed results across three evaluations, but there were statistically significant reductions in internalizing and externalizing problems, functioning, and severity of problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Kansas City (MO) No Violence Alliance |
|
Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Arrests | This is a focused deterrence violence-reduction strategy. The goal was to lower the city’s exposure to violent crime, including reducing the numbers of homicides and aggravated assaults committed by chronic violent individuals operating within organized groups and other social networks. The program is rated No Effects. Two years postimplementation, there was no statistically significant impact on homicides, group-member-involved homicides, and aggravated assaults. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Intensive Judicial Supervision (IJS) in Parramatta Drug Court (Australia) |
|
Drug courts, Heroin, Courts, Problem-solving courts, Sanctions, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Opioids | This intervention was designed to increase the level of judicial oversight on participants convicted of misdemeanor crimes in the Parramatta Drug Court program. The program was rated Promising. Results indicated that participants under intensive judicial supervision had lower rates of positive drug tests, compared with the comparison group. This difference was statistically significant. However, there were no statistically significant differences in sanctions, program progression or termination. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Pathways to Education (Canada) |
|
Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a multicomponent program that aims to improve academic outcomes for high school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds primarily through a relationship with a student-parent support worker. This program is rated Promising. Youth eligible for the program were more likely to have graduated from high school and enrolled in postsecondary education within 5 years after starting high school, compared with youth in the comparison group. This difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Proactive Soft Policing at Hot Spots (Peterborough, England) |
|
Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This is a focused policing strategy to reduce calls for service and crime in hot spots using increased foot patrols by civilian police community support officers. The program is rated No Effects. Hot spots that were assigned civilian proactive police community support officers did not experience statistically significant reductions in calls for service or crime. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: New York City Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) |
|
Truancy, Jobs and workforce development, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Schools, Campus, Employment initiatives | A summer youth employment program that is designed to improve school attendance, academic achievement, and employment of low-income youth between the ages of 14 and 24. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in school attendance or academic achievement between program participants and the control group. However, there were statistically significant differences in employment and earnings for program participants, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Intensive Supervision Probation (ISP) of Adult Males (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Probation, Crime prevention, Recidivism | The program provides more restrictive community supervision to individuals at higher risk of committing serious crimes. The program is rated No Effects. Individuals on ISP showed no difference in offending, by first new offense or offense type, from those on standard probation. However, there was a statistically significant greater likelihood for the ISP treatment group to have absconded, been incarcerated, and had hearings for technical violations, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Coaching for Communities (CfC) [United Kingdom] |
|
Youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Alcohol | This is a mentoring program for youth who show low levels of antisocial behavior. This program was rated Promising. Youth in the program had statistically significant improvements in offending behavior, antisocial behavior, negative affect, association with antisocial peers, emotional well-being, and involvement in education or employment, compared with youth in the control group, but not in volume of offending behavior, use of alcohol or drugs, impulsivity, or aspirations for the future. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Master Mind |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a mindfulness education and substance abuse prevention program for fourth- and fifth-grade students, which was designed to build self-regulatory skills and reduce intentions to use alcohol or tobacco. This program was rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in measures of executive functioning, social problems, and aggression. There were no statistically significant effects on attention problems and intentions to use substances. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cautioning and Relationship Abuse (CARA) [Southampton, England] |
|
Dating violence, Problem-oriented policing, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Arrests | This was a policing strategy designed to reduce the severity of intimate partner violence and the rearrests of males who had been previously arrested for, or had admitted to, a first domestic violence offense and received a conditional caution. The program is rated Promising. Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in frequency and prevalence of rearrests of persons assigned to the treatment group compared with those assigned to the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Period of PURPLE Crying |
|
Trauma | This is a preventative approach that uses educational materials to inform caregivers about the frustration caused by an infant’s prolonged crying and about behaviors that reduce the risk of shaking and abuse. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups on measures of crying generally, unsoothable crying, and caregiver self-talk. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Coping Power Program-Child Component for Pakistani School Children |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based prevention program that targets fifth- and sixth-grade boys’ early aggressive behaviors to avoid later antisocial behavior in adolescence and adulthood. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect in reducing both aggression in the boys and their tendency to interpret others’ actions as hostile. The program also improved the boys’ ability to respond in appropriate, non-aggressive ways to a variety of scenarios. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: PTSD Coach Smartphone App for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms |
|
Internet, Coping | This is a smartphone app intervention designed to help manage and reduce posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The program is rated Promising. Over time, symptoms of PTSD, such as depression, and psychosocial functioning, reduced more for the treatment group, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in users’ confidence in managing their PTSD symptoms and reaching out for support. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Peraj Mentoring Program (Mexico) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Campus, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program for fifth- and sixth-grade public school students who are at increased risk for underachievement and antisocial behaviors. The program’s goals are to strengthen a students’ self-esteem, social skills, motivation, and study skills using college student mentors. This program was rated as Promising. Students who participated in the program had a statistically significantly lower risk of dropping out of school, compared with students in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation Thumbs Down (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
|
Gang Crime, Sensors/Surveillance, Surveillance, Warrants, Gangs, Crime prevention, Arrests | An FBI-led, anti-gang strategy in Los Angeles, California, designed to reduce neighborhood-level violent crime through the identification, disruption, and dismantling of violent street gangs. This program is rated Effective. Results indicated a statistically significant 22 percent reduction per month in violent crime between the treatment areas and the comparison areas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Effect of Hot Spots Policing Strategies on Citizen-Officer Interactions (St. Louis, Missouri) |
|
Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This intervention used two hot spots policing strategies (problem solving and directed patrol) to improve citizens’ perceptions of police in St. Louis, Mo. The program is rated No Effects. Although residents in both treatment groups reported a statistically significant increase in cooperation with the police, the preponderance of evidence suggests that the intervention had no significant impact on citizens’ perceptions of procedural justice, police legitimacy, or police abuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: YouthBuild Offender Program |
|
Diversion, Reentry, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Employment initiatives | The program provides education, vocational training, and other youth-development services to low-income youths, ages 16–24, who have been convicted of a crime. The program is rated Promising. The program statistically significantly reduced recidivism and increased the likelihood of receiving a high school diploma, GED, trade license, or training certificate. However, there were no effects on enrollment in postsecondary courses, employment, or certain measures of youth development. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Birmingham South, UK) |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Community policing, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Arrests, Equipment and technology | Police body-worn cameras are used to record police encounters with citizens during officers’ shifts in Birmingham South. Officers were instructed to begin recording as soon as they left their vehicles and to conclude recording once the situation was resolved. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in officers’ use of force and citizen injury, but no statistically significant reduction in officer injury. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: KEEP (Keeping Foster and Kinship Parents Supported and Trained) |
|
Foster care/child welfare system | This a parent-training intervention for foster and kinship parents with a foster child in the home ages 4 to 12, designed to reduce children’s problem behaviors by strengthening foster parents’ skills. The program is rated Effective. The program was found to statistically significantly improve child problem behaviors, increase parents’ use of positive reinforcement relative to discipline, reduce parenting stress, and increase positive exits from the foster home for children. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Body-Worn Cameras to Reduce Use of Force by and Against Police in Eight Police Departments in the U.K. and U.S. |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Community policing, Situational crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Equipment and technology | This is a police body-worm camera intervention that has been implemented across eight police departments in the United States and United Kingdom. The program equips officers with continuously recording body-worn cameras to record police and citizen interactions. The program is rated No Effects. There was no significant effect on police use of force, and use of cameras was associated with a statistically significant increase in assaults against officers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Stop, Question, and Frisk in New York City |
|
Problem-oriented policing, Law enforcement, Crime prevention | This is a policing strategy in which officers may stop and detain an individual if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is committing or about to commit a crime. The program is rated Promising. Significant effects were found on measures of non-traffic-related crime incidents in three of the five boroughs of New York City. A U.S. Federal Court ruled that stop, question, and frisks as implemented were unconstitutional and appointed a special monitor to institute substantive reforms. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Common Sense Parenting (CSP) Plus |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | A parent training program designed to develop healthy parenting practices to improve child emotional regulation skills and high school preparedness among low-income eighth graders and their families during high school transition. This program is rated no effects. The study found no statistically significant differences in parenting practices (positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor supervision, and rationales for parental decisions) between program participants and the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Operation Swordfish (Birmingham, UK) |
|
Burglary, Property crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime | This intervention was designed to prevent repeat and near-repeat burglaries. The program used a target-hardening, crime-prevention technique to reduce repeat victimization of the same households and neighbors within the same area. The program is rated No Effects. The program found no statistically significant difference in both burglaries and time-to-repeat victimization between households in the treatment group, compared with households in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Guided Self-Change |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances | This brief, cognitive behavioral, motivational intervention was designed to address alcohol and other drug use as well as aggressive behaviors among English- and Spanish-speaking adolescents who were already involved in drugs and aggressive behavior. This program is rated No Effects. The study found no statistically significant differences in measures of substance use and aggressive behaviors between adolescents in the treatment group, compared with adolescents receiving standard care. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cook County (Ill.) State Attorney's Deferred Prosecution Program (DPP) |
|
Diversion, Sentencing, Courts | This is an alternative sentencing program aimed at diverting individuals who committed first-time nonviolent felony offenses from the criminal justice system. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed no statistically significant differences between the treatment group and comparison group on rearrests rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Pretrial GPS Supervision of Intimate Partner Violence Defendants (Western Region, United States) |
|
Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a court-based, pretrial, GPS supervision intervention for defendants arrested for intimate partner violence offenses. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed no statistically significant reductions in risk of rearrests, domestic rearrests, or failure to appear in court. However, the program did show statistically significant reductions in defendants’ risk of failure to appear at meetings with pretrial services. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Free Talk |
|
Juvenile courts, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Marijuana, Alcohol, Diversion, Youth/peer courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile delinquency, Substance abuse, Legal substances | This is a group, motivational interviewing program for adolescents with a first-time alcohol or drug offense. The goal of the program is to prevent negative consequences of alcohol and other drug use. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups on past month frequency of alcohol, heavy drinking, or marijuana use; alcohol or marijuana consequences; recidivism; delinquency; and alcohol and other drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: GenerationPMTO (Parent Model Training Oregon) |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a parent-training program for parents who have gone through a recent marital separation and for their families. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing measures of youths’ delinquency, arrests, and problem behaviors and improving measures of parenting skills. There was no effect, however, on parents’ use of appropriate discipline. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: High-Risk Revocation Reduction (HRRR) Program in Minnesota |
|
Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This is an adult reentry program designed to reduce recidivism among high-risk males who were previously released from a state prison but returned to prison for violating conditions of their supervised release. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on reducing revocation and reconviction; however, it did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing rearrests and reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Drug Treatment Court (Snohomish County, WA) |
|
Drug courts, Family courts, Drug-Related Victimization, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system | This is a program for parents who have substance abuse allegations and are involved in the child welfare system. The program is rated Effective. The study found that parent participants were more likely to have their children returned, more likely to experience a permanency-planning outcome, and less likely to have their parental rights terminated. Additionally, children of program participants spent less time in the child welfare system. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Hotspots Policing at Bus Stops (London) |
|
Problem-oriented policing, Situational crime prevention, Victims of crime | This crime prevention strategy applied hot spots policing techniques to bus stops in London, England. The program is rated No Effects. Generally, there was no statistically significant difference in bus driver reports of crime for treatment bus stops relative to control bus stops. The program also had a reverse effect on victim reports of crime, which increased in treatment bus stops, compared with control bus stops. This finding was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Check & Connect Plus Truancy Board (C&C+TB) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Child health and welfare | This is a school-based program that integrates a case-management framework for providing social support to truant youth. The goals of the program are to improve school attendance and renew progress toward graduation. This program is rated Promising. Students in the intervention group were more likely to have graduated and less likely to have dropped out than students in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Foundations of Violence Against Women (VAW) Online Training Course |
|
Computers, Dating violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a 4-week online training course for individuals working or planning to work with survivors of intimate partner violence. The course covers a wide range of topics for building a strong, violence against women program and is based on feminist intersectional principles and values. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in the intervention group’s scores on knowledge and attitudes, compared with the wait-list comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Partner Aggression |
|
This was an emotional- and behavioral-skills enhancement program targeted at adults who engaged in aggressive behavior with their partners. This group-format program aimed to promote psychological flexibility and thereby decrease aggression in participants. The program is rated Effective. Participants reported less physical and psychological aggression at post-treatment and at the 6-month follow up. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||
Program Profile: Police-Monitored CCTV Cameras in Newark, N.J. |
|
Motor vehicle theft, Gun violence, Homicide, Robbery, Sensors/Surveillance, Computers, Situational crime prevention, Larceny/theft, Crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), Law enforcement, Violent crime, Equipment and technology | This program is designed to deter street-level crime in Newark using closed-circuit cameras, hard-wired to physical structures, which are monitored in real time by CCTV operators. The program is rated No Effects. Results from one study showed no statistically significant differences in shootings, auto thefts, or thefts from autos. Results from a second study showed a statistically significant decrease in auto thefts but no statically significant difference in shootings or thefts from auto. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Decide Your Time (Delaware) |
|
Drug testing, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Sanctions, Courts, Drugs | This was a program for chronic drug-using persons on probation that incorporated graduated sanctions with incentives to reduce recidivism and drug use among participants. The program is rated No Effects. Implemented in Delaware, the program was shown to have no impact on the successful completion of probation, on re-arrests, or on drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Choosing to Think, Thinking to Choose |
|
Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism | This is a cognitive–behavioral therapy program, consisting of 14 sequential classroom lessons, for high-risk persons on probation and delivered by probation officers in a community correctional environment. This program was rated No Effects. Results indicate that participants had a statistically significant lower recidivism rate, measured as committing any new offense compared with nonparticipants, however, no statistically significant differences were found across individual offense types. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Enhancing Resiliency Amongst Students Experiencing Stress-Prosocial (ERASE-Stress–Prosocial) in Israel |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a universal, school-based intervention for Jewish-Israeli students who are exposed to the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It combines the original ERASE-Stress program with six additional modules focused on topics related to prosocial orientation, and aims to reduce PTSD, enhance resiliency, and develop prosocial skills. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significant reduce PTSD severity, functional problems, anxiety, and somatic complaints. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Enhancing Resiliency Amongst Student Experiencing Stress (ERASE-Stress) in Israel |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Schools | This intervention is a universal, school-based intervention for Jewish-Israeli students who are exposed to the ongoing violence of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The program aims to reduce participants’ posttraumatic stress symptoms. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to be statistically significant in reducing PTSD severity, functional problems, anxiety, and somatic complaints. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Milwaukee Safe Streets Prisoner Release Initiative (PRI) |
|
Mental health, Prisons, Reentry, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program combines enhanced employment opportunities and wraparound services for incarcerated persons before and after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in likelihood of rearrests for program group participants, compared with the control group. There was also a lower rate of reimprisonment for program participants than nonparticipants; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Incredible Years-Teacher Classroom Management Program |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a preschool-based program designed to strengthen teachers’ classroom-management strategies and develop children’s social and problem-solving skills. The program is rated Promising. Across multiple measures, there was a statistically significant reduction in conduct problems and increase in prosocial behavior among participating children, compared with non-participating children. However, some measures showed no statistically significant effect of the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Offender Profiling (OP) Applied in Active Police Investigations in Burglaries in Florida |
|
Burglary, Evidence, Property crime, Crime prevention, Investigations, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Policing strategies | This is a criminal investigation method used by law enforcement to increase burglary arrest rates using statistically derived profiles of convicted persons. The intervention was implemented in one police department in Florida for use in active burglary investigations. The program was rated Effective. Results showed a statistically significant increase in burglary arrest rates for the police department that implemented the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Restorative Justice Conferences (London, England) |
|
Robbery, Burglary, Victims of crime, Property crime, Crime prevention | This is a restorative justice program that uses face-to-face conferences to reduce posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among burglary/robbery victims and reconviction rates among those who committed the offense. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in victims’ clinical levels of PTSS, but no statistically significant effect on reconviction rates among those who committed the offense. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Improving Forensic Responses to Residential Burglaries (Queensland) |
|
Burglary, Evidence, Fingerprints, Property crime, Investigations, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Victims of crime | This program aims to improve police officers’ forensic evidence-collection techniques at burglary crime scenes to increase solved burglaries. The program also intends to improve police–victim and police–witness interactions at burglary crime scenes. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant increase in solved burglary cases. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Behavior Intervention at Cook County (Ill.) Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (JTDC) |
|
Youth development, Treatment, Juvenile justice | This behavioral intervention targeted high-risk juvenile arrestees in a detention center in Chicago. The curriculum focused on correcting automatic or reactive behavior, with the goal of reducing both the probability and number of readmissions. The program is rated Promising. Participants were less likely to be readmitted and had fewer readmissions to the detention center, compared with non-participants. This difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Crime Hot Spots Intervention (Sacramento, Calif.) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Motor vehicle theft, Assault, Robbery, Patrol, Situational crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Problem-oriented policing | This program involved officers patrolling crime hot spots in roughly 15-minute intervals to reduce crime. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in aggregated Part 1 crimes and Part 1 property crimes in the treatment hot spots, compared with control areas, during the 90-day intervention period, when compared with the same period 1 year prior. However, there was no statistically significant effect on calls for service, soft crime, and Part 1 violent crimes Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ability School Engagement Program (Australia) |
|
Truancy, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a police–school partnership intervention that seeks to reduce antisocial and truant behaviors among youth and increase their willingness to attend school. This program is rated Promising. The results show a statistically significant positive effect on truancy for program participants. Students who participate in the program are less likely to miss school and more likely to report being willing to attend school, compared with students who do not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SAM (Solution, Action, Mentorship) Program for Adolescent Girls |
|
Girls, Schools, Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, substance-use-prevention program for adolescent girls, which uses solution-focused brief therapy and community and peer mentorship. The program is rated Promising. Program participation was shown to have a statistically significant effect on lowering drug use, improving social competence, increasing knowledge surrounding drug use, and increasing negative attitudes toward drug use. The program had no statistically significant effect on grade point average or self-esteem. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Moms' Empowerment Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Violent crime, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program provides support for mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). The goal of the program is to assist mothers and ultimately improve their children’s adjustment. The program was rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in children’s externalizing behaviors and attitudes about family violence, although there was no effect on children’s internalizing behaviors. Mothers in the program also experienced greater reductions in IPV over time. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Functional Family Parole |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a supervision program that incorporates family-focused, strengths-based principles of Functional Family Therapy. The goal of the program is to reduce re-arrests and increase employment rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the intervention were less likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be employed, and earned more per quarter, compared with the comparison group. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Telephone Support Services for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Recruited from a Midwestern Pediatric Emergency Department |
|
Victimization, Victims of crime, Violent crime | This program provided resources via telephone to women victimized by intimate partner violence (IPV). It provided referrals to community programs, helped participants overcome barriers to obtaining services, and provided social support. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on IPV victimization, feeling vulnerable to someone, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Check & Connect |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Child health and welfare, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, structured mentoring program designed to reduce school absences and promote student engagement. This program is rated No Effects. One study found students in the program had statistically significant fewer days absent and more days in school. However, program students also had statistically significant lower math scores. There were no other statistically significant differences in outcomes. A second study also found no statistically significant differences Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Gender-Responsive Intervention for Female Juvenile Offenders |
|
Girls, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Treatment, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This program provided gender-responsive services in two group homes for female youths who had been adjudicated in the delinquency (formal probation) or truancy divisions of juvenile court. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in that the girls who received gender-responsive services had lower recidivism rates after 2 years, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) and Non-Hospital Residential (NHR) Program |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism | These were community-based, substance abuse treatment programs for recently paroled, substance-dependent individuals. The primary aim of the programs was to treat participants’ substance abuse in the community while reducing their likelihood of reoffending. The program is rated Promising. Program participants were less likely to be convicted of a new crime, when compared with the community comparison group; this was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: A Safety Awareness Program (ASAP) for Women with Disabilities |
|
Assault | This program is designed to increase safety awareness, knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, and behaviors as well as increase social support among women with disabilities. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to produce a statistically significant increase among participants’ scores on measures of safety planning, safety knowledge, and safety-promoting behaviors, compared with non-participants. The groups did not differ on measures of safety awareness following the intervention. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Restorative Justice Program (Midwest County) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Victims of crime | This program provides an alternative to juvenile court processing for youths with justice system contact who may or may not have a criminal record. The program is rated Promising. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and comparison groups on rates of official police contact, the average number of days to re-arrest was statistically significantly lower for the treatment group (441.7 days) than for the comparison group (254.1 days). Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Second Step for Elementary School (2011 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based, social–emotional learning program for elementary school students. Teachers incorporate 25-40-minute lessons within the usual classroom curriculum. The program is rated No Effects. The treatment group displayed a statistically significant reduction in hyperactivity; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups on measures of conduct problems, peer problems, social–emotional competence, or disruptive behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Step: Student Success Through Prevention Middle School Program (2008 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a universal, school-based social-emotional learning program aimed at reducing violence and encouraging academic success among middle school students. The program is rated No Effects. While the program had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical aggression, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual-violence victimization and perpetration, peer victimization, bullying victimization and perpetration, cyberbullying, or homophobic name calling. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Mentally Ill Offender Community Transition Program (Washington) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Recidivism, Crime prevention | The program is targeted at individuals whose mental illnesses are seen as instrumental in their offenses, and who are likely to qualify for and benefit from publicly supported treatment in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism . The program is rated Effective. Participants in the program were less likely to be convicted of any new offense and convicted of felony offenses, compared with the matched comparison group. The difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive Skills Training (Georgia) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives | Implemented by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, this is a cognitive–behavioral program for male parolees that aims to build psychosocial skills in areas such as self-control, interpersonal problem-solving, and critical reasoning. The program is rated No Effects. The authors found no statistically significant effect of program participation on recidivism and employment measures. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Discretionary Parole in New Jersey |
|
Parole, Prisons, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This allows individuals to be released early from a prison in New Jersey and complete the remainder of their sentences under supervision, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group released early from prison had statistically significantly lower rates of reconviction, number of days until reconviction, re-arrests, and days to re-arrest, compared with those who had completed their entire sentences and were unconditionally released to the community. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Intensive Supervision for Persons on Probation at High-Risk of Committing Offenses (California) |
|
Probation, Federal parole guidelines, Community corrections, Reentry | This is an enhanced probation intervention targeted at high-risk individuals in three counties in California. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects of the intervention on rearrest. At one site, the treatment group had statistically significantly more technical violations, than the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on technical violation rates at the other two sites. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Florida Work Release Program |
|
Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives, Reentry | This reentry program allows individuals who are nearing the end of their custodial sentences to work regular jobs in the community. The program is based in work release centers in participants’ counties of residence in Florida. The program is rated as Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing reconvictions of participants and increasing their employment and quarterly earnings post-release. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Deterrent Effect of a Warning Banner in a Computer System |
|
Computers, Sensors/Surveillance, Crime prevention | A warning banner was presented to unauthorized computer system trespassers each time a computer system was illegally infiltrated, to deter further engagement with the attacked computer system and to prevent subsequent infiltration. The program is rated No Effects. Across multiple studies, results showed that the intervention did not deter trespassers from engaging with the computer system; however, there was a small, statistically significant effect on the duration of trespassing incidents. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: North Carolina Vocational Delivery System |
|
Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to assist justice-involved young adults (ages 18 to 22) in obtaining postrelease employment. It involved an integrated system of vocational training and reentry services to reduce the rate of rearrest after release. This program is rated No Effects. Results suggest there were no statistically significant differences in measures of recidivism and employment between young adults who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Minnesota Prison Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to help individuals make a successful transition from prison to the community through provision of stable housing and support to obtain employment. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant decrease in rearrest, reconviction, and reincarceration rates, and an improvement in employment and number of hours worked. However, participants also had a statistically significant higher likelihood of revocations for technical violations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Violent Offender Treatment Program (VOTP) |
|
Violent offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Homicide, Violent crime, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This treatment program aims to reduce recidivism among youths convicted of violent offenses and capital crimes (such as murder) in one southern state. The program offers six months of intensive, therapeutic treatment to juveniles in a residential facility before they are released. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in reduced recidivism rates for juveniles who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Hillsborough County (FL) Family Dependency Treatment Court |
|
Family courts, Family reunification | This program consists of a specialized court for substance-using caregivers involved with the child welfare system. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed a statistically significant higher likelihood of family reunification and a lower likelihood that children would reenter care after permanent reunification. However, families that participated in the program achieved permanency at a statistically significant slower rate, compared with families that did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Returning Home - Ohio (RHO) Pilot Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention | This program linked incarcerated persons who had disabilities and were at risk for homelessness to supportive housing upon their release from prison. The goal was to reduce recidivism, homelessness, and multiple systems use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce the probability of rearrest (but not re-incarceration) and length of time from release to rearrest; however, treatment group participants were rearrested more frequently. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Brief Motivational Interviewing for Alcohol Use (Incarcerated Women) |
|
Alcohol, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to provide an alcohol intervention to incarcerated women with hazardous drinking habits who were being released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the number of days abstinent from alcohol consumption at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Implementation of Federal Sex-Offender Registry Requirements in 14 States |
|
Sex offenders, Sex offender management, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This was a registration requirement targeting individuals convicted of sex offenses and other crimes against children. The federal legislation required the registration of people released after serving time for a sex offense, including name, address, sex crime committed, and a photograph. The program is rated No Effects. The program did not statistically significantly reduce sex-crime rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Philadelphia (Penn.) Intensive Aftercare Probation Program |
|
Probation, Reentry, Violent offenders, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This program was an intensive alternative reintegration program for high-risk male juveniles who were being released to probation from a juvenile corrections facility. The program is rated Promising. Results showed that while there were no differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the percent who had been re-arrested during the 9-month follow up, the treatment group had a statistically significantly lower number of re-arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Earned Early Release (Washington State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Sentencing guidelines, Courts, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | Under a 2003 Washington State law, incarcerated individuals who had committed certain nonviolent offenses were able to acquire earlier release time of up to 50 percent of their maximum sentence. The program is rated Promising. Individuals who were released early under the law had a statistically significant lower rate of felony convictions, compared with individuals who were not released early; however, there was no statistically significant difference on violent convictions. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Skillman Intensive Aftercare Program (Pittsburgh and Detroit) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This was an aftercare program in Pittsburgh (Penn.) and Detroit (Mich.) for juveniles transitioning out of a residential correctional program. The intent of the program was to decrease instances of reconviction and re-arrest among participating youths after their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on rates of reconviction and rearrest among program participants in either city. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Employment Intervention for Drug-Involved Offenders (Kentucky) |
|
Drug courts, Problem-solving courts, Employment initiatives | This program for Kentucky drug court participants focuses on obtaining, maintaining, and upgrading employment. The intervention concentrates on job-skills and social-skills training. The program is rated No Effects. There was a small, statistically significant improvement for program participants on multiple drug use in the past 30 days, but no statistically significant effects for days worked at a legitimate job, income from a legitimate job, property damage, and handling stolen goods. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (Midwestern State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Prisons, Community corrections, Corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support parolees with successful transition back into the community. The program follows the principles of the risk-needs-responsivity model by targeting services to those with highest risk, addressing dynamic risk factors, and emphasizing cognitive-behavioral strategies throughout the program. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reconviction, but no effect on return to prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Indianapolis (Indiana) Reentry Project |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons | This was a reentry program in which individuals returning from prison were ordered by their parole or probation officers to participate in a 1-hour meeting within 90 days of their release. The meetings were meant to convey an intolerance for violence in the community and to allow the individuals to connect with service providers. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have no statistically significant effects on the likelihood of rearrest and the time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: College Program at Maryland Correctional Training Center (MCTC) |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This program offered postsecondary education for incarcerated individuals to reduce or break the cycle of continued or repeated criminal behavior. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower rate of arrests for a new crime than comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Social Support Treatment with Drug Testing (Maryland) |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Cocaine, Opioids | This program involves social support integrated with regular drug testing for recently paroled individuals who have a history of heroin and cocaine abuse. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower rate of reconviction, arrest, and incarceration, compared with the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on employment. Program participants also had a statistically significant higher positive drug-testing rate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SOURCE (Student Outreach for College Enrollment) Program |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Campus Crime, Campus, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This was a mentoring program in which high school juniors had regularly scheduled one-on-one contacts with trained college advisors to increase college attendance rates. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have small positive effects on enrollment rates and number of months enrolled in California State University and University of California campuses, but did not have statistically significant effects on 2-year, 4-year, or overall college enrollment or months of attendance. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Wayne County (Michigan) Second Chance Reentry Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a reentry program designed to reduce recidivism and increase reentry services for males, ages 13 to 18, who have committed offenses and are placed in a locked, residential treatment facility. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease recidivism rates among youths who participated in the program, compared with youths who received services as usual. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Brooklyn (NY) Mental Health Court |
|
Mental health courts, Diversion, Courts | This program seeks to divert adults with mental illness diagnoses who have committed misdemeanor and felony offenses away from the justice system and into treatment. The goals of the program are to ensure participants receive treatment for their mental disorders and do not have future contact with the justice system. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested and reconvicted, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Promotor Pathway Program |
|
Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a program that uses a caring adult, called a Promotor, to provide case management, mentoring, and advocacy for youths. This program is rated No Effects. The intervention had statistically significant positive effects on school enrollment, housing stability, and births, but had statistically significant negative effects on getting into a fight and binge drinking. There were no effects on employment, carrying a weapon, incarceration, marijuana use, or perception of control of one’s life. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Avon Park Youth Academy and STREET Smart Aftercare Program |
|
Training, Mental health, Diversion, Intake/assessment, Jobs and workforce development, Young juvenile offenders, Access to education, Reentry, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program was located at a secure-custody residential facility that provided educational and vocational training to moderate-risk male youth. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of obtaining a degree, compared with nonparticipants. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any arrest for any offense overall and felony arrest specifically, employment, time employed, or higher education enrollment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (North Dakota) |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support persons on parole with successful transition back into the community. Services include chemical dependency treatment, psychiatric treatment, educational training, and assistance in finding housing. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant, moderate effect on rearrest, but no statistically significant effect on revocation of parole. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Academic Mentoring Program for Educational Development (AMPED) |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mental health, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, mentoring program designed to improve academic performance and life satisfaction and reduce absences and behavioral infractions. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significant decrease in unexcused absences and higher math and English grades, compared with the control group. However, there were no effects on school-reported behavioral infractions, science or history grades, positive affect, negative affect, coping, or overall mental health. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Texas Intensive Supervision Parole (Houston and Dallas) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Assault, Homicide, Robbery, Drug testing, Parole, Drug possession, Community corrections, Prisons, Reentry | This program was designed to increase monitoring and control of persons on parole who demonstrated poor parole performance and were at high risk of returning to prison for a parole violation. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction, rearrest, and employment rates between groups in both Houston and Dallas. In Houston, program participants were significantly more likely to have technical violations than those in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act Sexual Assault Resistance Program (Canada) |
|
Girls, Campus Crime, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is an educational, skills-based workshop for first-year female college students. The program is designed to teach young women how to assess risk, overcome barriers in acknowledging danger, and engage in self-defense to reduce the risk of sexual assault. The program is rated Effective. The program showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of completed and attempted rape, nonconsensual sexual acts, and attempted coercion. There was no impact on the risk of attempted coercion. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Collaborative Behavioral Management in Six Sites |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program involved collaborative sessions among a parole officer, treatment counselor, and the person on parole. The intervention provided parole officers with positive tools to manage the behavior of people on parole. The program aimed to reduce substance use, crime, and re-arrest among drug-involved people on parole. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed that the intervention did not significantly reduce re-arrest or overall drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Regional Treatment Centre Sex Offender Treatment Program (Canada) |
|
Sex offenders, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This inpatient program provides group and individual therapy to those who have committed sexual offenses and have recently been released from prison in Ontario, Canada. The program is rated No Effects. There was no significant difference in sexual recidivism rates between the treatment group and the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | This boot camp intervention in Minnesota combines a traditional military institutional program for 6 months with two 6-month phases of intensive, supervised release aftercare. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significant lower rates of re-arrest, felony reconviction, and return to prison for a new offense than the comparison group, but no statistically significant difference in the rate of return to prison for any offense. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Back Door Electronic Monitoring (Sweden) |
|
Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons, Sentencing, Courts | This program in Sweden involves the use of an ankle bracelet to determine the location of an individual who has been released following a short-term stay in prison. The overall goal is to reduce reoffending rates of participants. The program is rated Promising. Significantly fewer program participants were convicted of a new offense and sentenced to prison at the 3-year follow up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: San Diego (Calif.) Prisoner Reentry Program |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Prisons, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | The program, established by Senate Bill 618, aimed to educate and rehabilitate incarcerated individuals who committed nonviolent felony offenses in an effort to reduce recidivism and revocations to prison. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant impact on program participants’ rates of rearrest. However, there were no statistically significant differences on reconviction and return to prison rates between program participants and those who were not in the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: High Intensity Training (HIT) Regime at Thorn Cross Young Offenders Institution (England) |
|
Reentry, Corrections | This program is a correctional boot camp that combines elements of military training with elements of rehabilitation to prepare individuals ages 18 to 21 (considered “young offenders”) for reentry into their communities. The program is rated No Effects. At the 10-year follow up, there was no statistically significant impact on reconviction rates. Program participants had a statistically significant fewer number of reconvictions, compared with the control group; however, the difference was small. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This program was designed to reduce relapse and criminal recidivism by providing comprehensive aftercare services to individuals convicted of felonies, with alcohol- and drug-related histories. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant program effects on rearrests, substance abuse relapse, or employment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Community-Friendly Health Recovery Program (CHRP) |
|
Heroin, Opioids | This is an HIV risk-reduction intervention targeting opioid-dependent individuals in drug treatment, with the objective of reducing drug- and sex-related HIV risks. The program is rated Promising. Individuals in the CHRP intervention showed statistically significant improvement on drug and sex risk-reduction skills over time; however, there was no effect on their knowledge of safer drug use, social motivation, and self-efficacy. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Enhanced Thinking Skills (England) |
|
Corrections, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs | This is a prison-based, cognitive–behavioral skills enhancement program in England. The program is rated Effective. Program participants showed statistically significant reductions in reconviction rates and frequency of reoffending, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in severe offense reconviction rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (Cook County, Ill.) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention linked women who committed nonviolent offenses to community-based, substance use treatment after release from jail. It was designed to reduce recidivism and alcohol and drug use, and to promote long-term recovery. This program is rated No Effects. The treatment group had a statistically significant greater likelihood of participating in substance use treatment; however, there were no significant effects for recidivism, alcohol and drug use, or number of days spent in jail. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Automated Vehicle Locator (AVL) Information to Aid Patrol Allocations (Dallas, Texas) |
|
Vehicles, Dispatching, Patrol, Property crime, Motor vehicle theft, Crime prevention, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This program examined whether access to deployment data collected through technology impacted police commanders’ management of resources and led to reductions in crime. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant decrease in crime at the hot spot level. However, there were no significant differences in crime at the beat level, in consistency between patrols assigned and delivered per beat and per hot spot, or in number of hours of patrol on beats or in hot spots. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Turning Point Multiple DUI Treatment Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Traffic laws, Crime prevention, Law enforcement, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This was a residential treatment program that targeted individuals who committed multiple driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offenses. The program combined educational components with individualized treatment and therapy to address substance use. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group was statistically significantly less likely than the comparison group to be arrested for any new offense and specifically for a DUI offense, but not for committing an alcohol-related offense. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Community Mediation Maryland Re-Entry Mediation |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention | This program brings together inmates, their families, and other supporters to discuss inmates’ past experiences and future expectations in a mediated session. The session is designed to facilitate communication, understanding, and a plan for reentry to help inmates successfully transition into the community after release. The program is rated Promising. This program showed a statistically significant reduction in rearrest, reconviction, and return to prison for program participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Residential Aftercare Component of Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program provides residential aftercare services for those with substance abuse issues who have completed the 6-month Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program. The program is rated No Effects. An examination of the impact of both 30- and 90-day aftercare programs found no statistically significant effects of treatment of either dosage on recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Minnesota's Enhanced Supervision Release Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Diversion, Courts | This was an intensive, supervised release program for persons at high risk for reoffense and who were mandated to residential treatment upon release from prison. The program gradually reduced restrictions as the persons on parole transitioned back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed no statistically significant effects on recidivism measures, including rearrest, revocation for technical violations, reconviction, and days in prison. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Implementation of Minnesota's Community Notification Act of 1997 to Reduce Reoffending |
|
Sex offenders, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Corrections, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Violent crime | This is a community notification program targeting people who have been released after serving time for sex offenses in Minnesota. This is a state response to the federal requirements of Megan’s Law and authorizes law enforcement to notify local communities about where people who have been released after serving time for sex offenses will be living. The program is rated Promising. The experimental notification group had lower recidivism rates for sexual crimes compared with the non-notification Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault | This 6-month program aims to reduce recidivism by diverting eligible candidates from prison to a boot camp that promotes discipline, structure, and characteristics of good citizenship and seeks to improve skills for reentry into the community. The program is rated Promising. Boot camp participants had statistically significantly lower rates of recidivism (measured as both rearrest and reincarceration) compared with nonparticipants at the 3-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: National Supported Work Demonstration Project (Multisite) |
|
Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program was designed to help hard-to-employ individuals acquire skills, habits, and credentials necessary to find and hold permanent, unsubsidized employment. The goal was to prepare individuals for regular employment, reduce unemployment, and reduce criminal behavior and substance use. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences on number of arrests and time to arrests between participants and nonparticipants. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Alameda County (Calif.) Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Program |
|
Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Crime prevention | This is a post-custody, community-based intervention for individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders. The program is rated No Effects. While the program statistically significantly reduced the number of reconvictions and incarcerations, it did not impact the number of arrests, days in jail, felony convictions, or percent of reconvictions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Bounce Back |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a cognitive-behavioral intervention for children who have been exposed to traumatic events, and for their parents. The goal is to help children improve their symptoms of posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety. The program is rated Promising. Children who received the treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements on measures of posttraumatic stress, anxiety symptoms, and emotional regulation; however, there was no impact on measures of depression or coping efficacy. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Connections Program (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Jails, Corrections, Reentry | This program used coordinated service teams to support mentally ill individuals leaving prison in transitioning back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of returning to jail during the program treatment period. However, there were no statistically significant effects on reconvictions during the program treatment period or return to jail at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ohio's Progressive Sanctioning Grid |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Courts | This program uses progressive sanction guidelines from the Ohio Adult Parole Authority to determine the appropriate amount of response by authorities with regard to individuals who violate supervision. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on risk of felony reoffending and major violation behavior in the first year of supervision. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Wichita (Kansas) Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a reentry program designed to facilitate selected individuals’ transition from incarceration to community living by providing work opportunities outside of correctional facilities and less structured housing alternatives. The program is rated Promising. Program completers had statistically significantly lower recidivism rates, compared with comparison group members who did not participate in the program, at the 3-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Lifestyle Change Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a psychological intervention for incarcerated males, which addresses the lifestyle concepts around crime, drug use, and gambling. The main objective of the program is to reduce recidivism through introducing program participants to lifestyle changes centering on the identification of conditions, choices, and cognition of crimes. The program is rated Promising. The program participants were statistically significantly less likely to be rearrested and reincarcerated during the follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: MindUp |
|
School safety, School climate, Schools | This is a classroom-based intervention that facilitates the development of social–emotional competence among students through “mindful attention” training. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed statistically significant increases in social–emotional competence, empathy, and perspective-taking; and decreases in aggressive and oppositional behaviors, fight starting, and rule breaking, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no impact on measures of kindness. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Ready, Willing, and Able (RWA) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Sentencing, Courts, Employment initiatives | This is a transitional employment program that gives those who are newly released from prison the opportunity to work and find housing. RWA seeks to provide clients with work and foundational skills so that they can find a job, secure housing, and become financially independent. The program is rated No Effects. After 3 years, RWA showed a statistically significant positive impact on jail sentences, but there was no statistically significant impact on arrests, convictions, and prison sentences. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: EMPLOY (Minnesota) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This is a prisoner-reentry employment program designed to reduce recidivism by helping participants find and retain employment after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant lower rates of reconviction, rearrest, reincarceration, and revocations, and higher rates of employment and hours worked, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in hourly wage. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Tulsa (OK) Family Drug Court |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug courts, Family courts, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Problem-solving courts, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a treatment court dedicated to cases of child abuse and neglect, in which parental substance abuse is one of the primary reasons for child welfare involvement. The program provides parenting training in conjunction with substance abuse treatment to increase the likelihood of reunification. The program is rated Effective. Families who received services through the Family Drug Court were statistically significantly more likely to reunify than comparison families. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: San Juan County (N.M.) DWI First Offenders Program-Victim Impact Panels |
|
Victim impact panels, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Traffic laws, Driving Under the Influence (DUI), Law enforcement, Traffic law enforcement, Victims of crime | The program is a component of the San Juan County (N.M.) DWI First Offenders Program, which was designed to reduce driving while intoxicated (DWI) recidivism, alcohol consumption, and drinking and driving behavior by exposing them to testimonials from victims of drunk-driving accidents. The program is rated No Effects. No statistically significant differences were found between VIP and no-VIP program participants on DWI recidivism over 2 years, and on various measures of drinking. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to improve behavioral and performance job skills, provide services and support, and help find job placements for participants leaving prison. The program is rated No Effects. The results showed that participation in transitional job services had no statistically significant impact on employment or recidivism over the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Primary Care-Based Complex Care Management (San Francisco, Calif.) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Health and mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to provide a lower cost alternative to emergency medical treatment for chronically ill individuals who have been recently released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group participants had statistically significantly lower rates of emergency room use, compared with the control group. However, there was no impact on recidivism and primary care utilization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Green Dot Intervention Program |
|
Dating violence, Campus Crime, Drug-Related Victimization, School climate, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to increase active-bystander behaviors and reduce dating and sexual violence in college and high school students. The program is rated Promising. Students who participated in the program had a statistically significantly greater number of observed and self-reported active-bystander behaviors than students who did not participate. However, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual violence victimization or sexual harassment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Postsecondary Correctional Education (New Mexico) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | The program provides postsecondary educational classes and programs to prisoners via one-way Internet courses or onsite vocational instruction. The goal of the program is to reduce arrests following release from prison. The program is rated Promising. This program was shown to statistically significantly reduce arrests within the 1-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: New Jersey Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC) |
|
Sex offenders, Mental health, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault | The program provides cognitive–behavioral treatment and relapse prevention to people who commit repetitive, compulsive sex offenses. Cognitive–behavioral treatments focus on reconstructing person’s cognitive distortions; relapse prevention focuses on pattern recognition and breaking the cycle of recommitting sex crimes. The program is rated Promising. The intervention participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating, compared with the general prison-population. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disturbances |
|
Mental health, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This cognitive–behavioral mentoring intervention was designed to improve child behavior and family functioning among 8- to 12-year olds with mental health disorders, and their primary caregivers. This program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on measures of child behavior, parenting stress, perceived social support, and attachment to parents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive-Behavioral, Group-Mentoring Intervention for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disturbances |
|
Mental health, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This cognitive–behavioral, group-mentoring intervention was designed to improve child behavior and family functioning among 8- to 12-year olds with mental health disorders, and their primary caregivers. This program is rated Promising. Although there were statistically significant improvements on measures of social problem solving and behavior problems, there were no improvements on measures of social skills among children in the intervention group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Canton of Vaud (CV) Community Supervision Program (Switzerland) |
|
Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This program was designed to provide a community service alternative to short custodial sentences for inmates, with the goal of improving measures of recidivism (reconviction) and social integration (marriage/employment). This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant, long-term effects on reconviction and social integration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police Body-Worn Cameras (Rialto, Calif.) |
|
Sensors/Surveillance, Community policing, Law enforcement operations, Equipment and technology | This program equips individual police officers in Rialto, Calif., with body-worn cameras to record police encounters during shifts. The program aims to reduce use-of-force incidents and citizen complaints by increasing mutual accountability. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in police use-of-force, but no statistically significant difference in citizens’ complaints. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Challenging Horizons Program - Mentoring Version (CHP-Mentoring) |
|
Mental health, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based intervention designed to help students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) develop, practice, and generalize academic and social skills by using volunteer mentors to deliver skills training to students. This program is rated as No Effects. Academic functioning and parent/teacher ratings of student behavior reflecting ADHD symptoms did not differ statistically significantly for youths in the intervention group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Early Start to Emancipation Preparation - Tutoring Program |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a tutoring intervention designed to improve reading and math skills among 14- to 15-year old youths in foster care who were 1 to 3 years behind grade level in reading and/or math. The program also aimed to build a mentoring relationship between the youth and the tutor and provide access to independent living workshops. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on any of the outcomes assessed. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Challenging Horizons Program - After-School Version (CHP-After School) |
|
Mental health, Afterschool, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is an after-school intervention designed to help students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) develop, practice, and generalize academic and social skills by using volunteer mentors to deliver skills training to students. This program is rated as No Effects. Academic functioning and parent/teacher ratings of student behavior reflecting ADHD symptoms did not differ statistically significantly between youths in the intervention group and those in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Case Management Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a mandatory jail reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. The program connected incarcerated persons to Reentry Probation Officers to help with pre-release reentry planning and continued supervision following release. The program was rated No Effects. No statistically significant differences were found between program participants and the comparison group on probation violations and probability of rear Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Specialist Program |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a two-phase reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. Phase 1 provided incarcerated persons with in-jail programming and services to prepare them for release. Phase 2 provided them with up to 12 months of supportive services in the community. The program was rated Effective. Program participants had a 10 percent chance of rearrest, compared with a 34 percent chance for the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Lethality Assessment Program (Oklahoma) |
|
Crime prevention, Violent crime, Victim services, Victims of crime | This is a crisis-response program in which police connect female victims of intimate partner violence with a social service provider, via telephone, at the scene of a domestic violence dispute. The program is rated Promising. When compared with the control group, program participants reported experiencing less violence at follow up. Participants were also more likely to receive an order of protection, and to contact domestic violence services. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cass County/Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Wellness Court (Walker, MN) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Courts, Crime prevention, Traffic law enforcement, Recidivism, Sentencing, Driving Under the Influence (DUI), Law enforcement | This is a post-sentencing, driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) court intended to guide individuals identified as drug- or alcohol-addicted into treatment, which is designed to reduce criminal behavior and recidivism, enhance public safety, and enhance the well-being of program participants. This program is rated Promising. Results suggest that after 2 years, DWI court graduates and participants were statistically significantly less likely to be rearrested than non-DWI court participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Group Violence Reduction Strategy (New Orleans, Louisiana) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Violent offenders, Surveillance, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Homicide, Crime prevention, Gun violence, Assault, Violent crime | This focused deterrence strategy in New Orleans, Louisiana, aims to reduce gang violence and homicide. The program is rated Effective. There were statistically significant reductions found in overall homicide, firearm-related homicide, gang member-involved homicide, and firearm assault from the pretest to the posttest period. Further, New Orleans showed significantly decreased homicide rates after the program was implemented, compared with 14 cities with similar violent crime rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Procedurally-Just Policing during Traffic Stops (Turkey) |
|
Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Procedural justice, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations | The program involved incorporating elements of procedural justice into traffic stops in Adana, Turkey, to test whether procedural justice improves citizens’ perceptions of the police and the law. The program is rated No Effects. No statistically significant differences were found between the treatment and control groups on general perceptions of the police, but the study did find statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in encounter-specific perceptions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Expressive Writing Intervention for At-Risk Urban Adolescents |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This was a school-based intervention targeting at-risk, seventh-grade students. The intervention included either a standard expressive-writing condition or an enhanced expressive-writing condition. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the standard writing treatment condition, the enhanced writing treatment condition, and the control condition on self- and teacher-reported measures of aggression and teacher-reported emotion regulation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Residence Restrictions for Sex Offenders (Jacksonville, Florida) |
|
Sex offenders, Probation, Sex offender management, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime | In 2005, the city of Jacksonville, Florida passed an ordinance that required persons convicted of sex offenses to reside more than 2,500 feet away from any place where children congregate. The goal was to reduce sex crimes, especially those committed against children. However, the city residence restriction law was later deemed unconstitutional in 2007. The program is rated No Effects. The residence restriction had no statistically significant impact on their rates of rearrests for sex crimes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Doors and Windows Ordinance (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
|
Environmental offenses, Weapons violations, Gun violence, Environmental design, Situational crime prevention | This environmental crime-prevention measure was enacted as a city ordinance and required property owners of abandoned buildings (that often serve as havens for illicit drugs and related crime) to install working doors and windows in all structural openings or be subject to significant fines. This program is rated Promising. The results show that the program was associated with statistically significant citywide reductions in overall crimes and all nuisance crimes, but not in violent gun crimes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Home-Visiting Program for Adolescent Mothers |
|
Girls, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a community-based program in which adolescent mothers had meetings with trained home visitors, who delivered a parenting and an adolescent curriculum. This program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants demonstrated statistically significantly improvements in parenting skills and school status compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on depressive symptoms, condom and hormonal contraceptive use, or repeat pregnancies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Minnesota Comprehensive Offender Reentry Plan (MCORP) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a case management program implemented in seven different correctional institutions across Minnesota. The program connected caseworkers in prisons with supervision agents in the communities to which participants return upon release from prison. The program is rated Promising. It statistically significantly reduced recidivism as measured by rearrest, reconviction, technical violation revocation, and reincarceration for any reason, but had no impact on new offense reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Better Futures Program |
|
Mental health, Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a program designed to help young people in foster care and with serious mental health challenges prepare for postsecondary education. The program is rated Effective. Youths who received the intervention had statistically significant improvements on self-determination, mental health empowerment, transition planning, career self-efficacy, hope, barriers to education, postsecondary preparation, and transition planning, but not on quality of life or mental health recovery. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial (ASSIST) Program |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This in-school smoking prevention program was designed to spread and sustain norms of non-smoking behavior among 12–13 year olds, using influential peer opinion leaders. The program is rated No Effects. Youths who received the intervention did not differ statistically significantly from youths who did not receive the intervention in their odds of smoking in the last week, at 2 years post-intervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Directed Patrol and Self-Initiated Enforcement in Hot Spots (St. Louis, Missouri) |
|
Assault, Robbery, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations | This experiment assessed the impact of two hot spots policing tactics on firearm violence. The program is rated Promising. Compared with comparison hot spots, hot spots that received self-initiated enforcement experienced a statistically significant reduction in firearm assault rates, but there were no statistically significant differences for hot spots that received directed patrol. There was no statistically significant effect on firearm robbery rates between treatment and comparison hot spots Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Effects of Information Letters on Paying Restitution (Pennsylvania) |
|
Restitution, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections | This experiment tested the effects of sending monthly reminder letters to persons on probation to pay restitution. The program is rated Promising. Persons on probation who received letters with only basic information paid statistically significant greater amounts and made a greater number of monthly payments, compared with people on probation who received no letters. However, there was no statistically significant difference between people on probation who received other types of letters and tho Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS) in Kansas |
|
Robbery, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Environmental design, Situational crime prevention, Burglary, Property crime, Crime prevention, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Law enforcement operations, Policing strategies | This is a law-enforcement model in which both location-based crime and automobile crash data is analyzed to determine where such incidents disproportionately occur (“hot spots”) and to employ targeted traffic enforcement strategies. The program is rated Promising. The areas of targeted enforcement experienced statistically significant declines in robberies, burglaries, and traffic crashes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Breaking the Cycle (JBTC) Program (Lane County, Oregon) |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Diversion, Case Management, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Diversion, Legal substances, Drugs, Drug treatment | Using comprehensive assessments, the program identified, provided, and coordinated individualized services for high-risk, drug-involved, justice-involved juveniles. This program is rated Effective. Results suggest that JBTC participants were significantly less likely to recidivate and had statistically significantly fewer arrests, compared with non-JBTC participants. However, the impact on self-reported drug use was mixed. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) Program (Seattle, Washington) |
|
Drug possession, Community policing, Jails, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Arrests | This is a pre-booking, community-based diversion program designed to divert those suspected of low-level drug and prostitution offenses away from jail and prosecution and into case management and other supportive services. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group had a statistically significant lower likelihood of having been rearrested, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on non-warrant rearrests. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Moving On (Minnesota) |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs | This is a curriculum-based, gender-responsive intervention created to address the different cognitive–behavioral needs of incarcerated women. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood to be rearrested and reconvicted, compared with the control group participants; however, the program did not have a significant impact on reincarcerations for a new offense and technical violation revocations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Social Learning/Feminist Intervention |
|
Girls, Dating violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Victimization, Victims of crime, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Violent crime, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault | This is a 12-session program for adolescent females with a history of exposure to violence/abuse and involvement in the child welfare system. The goal of the program was to reduce re-victimization in teen dating situations. The program used a health-promotion approach to help girls develop healthy relationships. The program is rated Promising. The intervention had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical re-victimization, but not sexual re-victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bronx (NY) Mental Health Court |
|
Mental health courts, Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Problem-solving courts, Diversion, Rape and sexual assault | This is a problem-solving court program that seeks to divert mentally ill adults who committed misdemeanor and felony offenses out of the justice system and into treatment to address their mental health issues and reduce their risk of recidivism. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant effect on rearrests or reconvictions for treatment group participants, compared with similar individuals with a mental disorder in jail, at the 30-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Risk Detection/Executive Function Intervention |
|
Girls, Dating violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Victims of crime, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a program for adolescent females with a history of violence/abuse and involvement in the child welfare system. The goal of the program was to reduce re-victimization in teen dating situations. The program used mindfulness-based, cognitive interventions to build skills for responding to risky situations (including reasoning and problem solving). The program is rated Promising. The intervention was shown to statistically significantly reduce sexual and physical re-victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Sources of Strength |
|
Mental health, Suicide, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring | This is a school-based, suicide prevention program designed to build socioecological-protective influences across a full student population, using youth opinion leaders from diverse social cliques to develop and deliver messaging aimed at changing the norms and behaviors of their peers. This program is rated Promising. Peer leaders in the intervention schools showed statistically significant improvements on perceptions and behaviors pertaining to suicide and on social connectedness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Youth Relationships Project |
|
Dating violence, Children exposed to violence, Youth development, Victimization, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This was a community-based prevention program that targeted youth at risk of becoming involved in abusive relationships. The program was rated Promising. Treatment group youth demonstrated statistically significant reductions in physical abuse perpetration and trauma symptoms and a lower likelihood of emotional abuse and threatening behavior victimization, compared with control group youth. However, there were no differences between groups in threatening behavior perpetration or hostility. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police Foot Patrol - Philadelphia 2010 |
|
Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Crime prevention | This strategy is aimed at reducing crime at violent-crime hot spots in Philadelphia, Pa., through police foot patrols. It involved having veteran officers patrol areas (an average of 3 miles of streets) during one shift per day. This program is rated No Effects. Relative to the control areas, increasing foot patrols at violent-crime hot spots had no statistically significant impact on violent crimes, violent felonies, or citizens’ perceptions of crime and safety. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Urban Debate League for High School Students |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Youth development, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a competitive, social-policy debate program to advance academic achievement, community contributions, and life success of students in grades 9 to 12 in urban school districts. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant, positive effect on high school graduation and college readiness, as indicated by ACT scores. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Effective Practices in Community Supervision (EPICS) |
|
Training, Parole, Probation | This is an initial training and coaching model targeted at community supervision officers. The overall goal is to teach community supervision officers how to translate principles of effective intervention into practice, and how to use core correctional practices in their interactions with persons convicted of a crime. The program is rated Promising. Officers in the treatment condition exhibited a greater use of core correctional skills over time than officers in the comparison condition. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Red Hook Community Justice Center: Criminal Court for Adults |
|
Administrative Employees, Restitution, Community courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sanctions | This is a problem-solving community court that seeks to prevent crime. One component of the program, the Criminal Court, hears misdemeanor cases and seeks to provide quick and meaningful sanctions to defendants in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. The program was rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on recidivism rates for defendants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Chicago (Ill.) Parent Program |
|
This is a culturally relevant parent training for Black and Latino parents of young children in low-income, urban areas that promotes parenting skills to reduce child problem behaviors. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in child aversive behavior and internalizing and externalizing behaviors, and in parent use of corporal punishment. There was no statistically significant effect on parent-reported child behavior problems or intensity. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||
Program Profile: Reading for Life (RFL) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Prosecution, Juvenile delinquency | This is a diversion program in which juveniles ages 13–18, who have committed non-violent offenses, study works of literature and classic virtue theory in small groups, led by trained volunteer mentors. The goal is to foster moral development and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significantly lower chance of being prosecuted for any offense (including misdemeanors and felonies) and fewer arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Prison Industry Enhancement Certificate Program (PIECP) |
|
Prisons, Correctional facilities, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | The program engages persons incarcerated in state prison in private sector jobs (which pay minimum wage or higher), in an effort to increase post-release employment and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Compared with those who worked in traditional prison industries and participated in other activities such as education and drug treatment, treatment group participants showed a statistically significant increase in post-release employment and a decrease in recidivism rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Queensland (Australia) Community Engagement Trial (QCET) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Community policing, Procedural justice, Situational crime prevention, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | The program tested whether police use of a specialized script (based on principles of procedural justice) during random breath-test traffic stops could improve perceptions of police and change people’s views about drinking and driving. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on changing views on police and on drinking and driving, on increasing satisfaction and compliance with police, and on strengthening perceptions of procedural justice. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ada County (Idaho) Drug Court |
|
Drug courts, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program provides court-supervised, community-based outpatient drug treatment and case management services to persons convicted of a felony drug offense. The goals are to increase accountability, decrease the likelihood of recidivism, and reduce drug dependency. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating, compared with comparison group participants who were placed on probation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: PROmoting School-Community-University Partnerships to Enhance Resilience (PROSPER) |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Methamphetamine, Illegal substances, Drugs | This is a community-based program that was designed to address substance abuse and antisocial behavior. The program is rated Promising. Students in the schools that implemented the PROSPER model had statistically significant fewer conduct problems and lower lifetime illicit substance use, compared with students in control schools. However, there were no statistically significant impacts on driving after drinking alcohol or frequency of drunkenness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SNAP® Girls |
|
Girls, Mental health, Youth development, Positive youth development, Treatment | Formerly known as SNAP® Girls Connection, the program includes concurrent child and parent groups, as part of a multi-component intervention for girls with disruptive behaviors and their families. The program focuses on self-control and emotion regulation to improve pro-social skills and reduce disruptive behavior. The program is rated Promising. The girls in the treatment group displayed statistically significantly lower levels of behavior problems than the girls in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment: Offender-Focused Policing |
|
Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention | This is a proactive, hot spots policing tactic that focuses attention on people who have been convicted of violent offenses operating in neighborhoods with high violent-crime rates. The program is rated Effective. Hot spots that received the treatment reported statistically significantly fewer violent crimes and violent felonies relative to the control areas. However, citizens’ perceptions of crime and safety were not impacted by the intervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Abecedarian Project |
|
Home visiting, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Substance abuse, Cocaine, Illegal substances | This was an early education intervention designed to improve cognitive and educational development among low-income children. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of being enrolled in college and having held skilled employment, a lower likelihood of being a teen parent, and fewer depressive symptoms, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in incarceration or drug use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Community-based Residential Programs (Ohio) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to reduce recidivism by placing released those convicted of offenses in halfway houses and community-based correctional facilities in Ohio, to provide a range of programming related to chemical dependency, education, employment, and family relationships. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of new arrests and reincarcerations, compared with those in the comparison group, at the 2-year follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Classroom-Centered Intervention to Reduce Risk of Substance Use |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Legal substances | This program was a preventive intervention for first-grade students, which was designed to reduce substance use risk by improving teachers’ behavior-management skills and enhancing classroom curricula. The program is rated Promising. Overall, results were mixed. The treatment group showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of self-reporting initiation of tobacco use and other drugs, compared with the control group. The program had no statistically significant impact on alcohol, mariju Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family-School Partnership Intervention to Reduce Risk of Substance Use |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Alcohol, Legal substances | The program was a universal, preventive intervention for first-grade students, designed to reduce the risk for substance use by improving teachers’ and parents’ communication and behavior-management skills. The program is rated Promising. Approximately 6 to 7 years after the program, participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of having initiated tobacco use, compared with nonparticipants. The program had no impact on alcohol, marijuana, inhalant, or other drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Baltimore County (Md.) Juvenile Drug Court |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Diversion, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Drug treatment | This program represents an alternative to traditional processing in the juvenile justice system. Rather than going through court processing, youth with substance-abuse problems are placed in treatment. The goal is to reduce their use of drugs and criminal behavior. The program is rated Promising. At the 2-year follow up, program participants had fewer overall and drug-related rearrests, compared with a matched comparison group. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Child FIRST |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Home visiting, Positive youth development, Treatment | This program is a comprehensive, home-based, therapeutic intervention for high-risk families with children ages 6–36 months. The program is rated No Effects. Although children in the program showed statistically significantly reduced externalizing problems, there was no impact on other outcomes, including internalizing problems, dysregulation, parent–child dysfunction, and parent distress. Overall, the preponderance of evidence suggests the program did not have an impact on children or parents. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Safe Neighborhoods (National Evaluation) |
|
Gun violence, Homicide, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Violent crime | This program is a multi-agency initiative to reduce gun violence in large cities through enhanced enforcement and deterrence. The program is rated Promising. Cities that received the program experienced a statistically significant reduction in violent crime, compared with control cities, between 2000 and 2006. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Brief Motivational Interviewing for Dating Aggression |
|
Dating violence, Alcohol | This program aims to reduce harmful behavior among young adult couples who are neither married nor cohabitating. It uses a brief counseling method to address ambivalence toward behavioral change and encourage self-motivation for behavioral change. The program is rated Promising. This program showed statistically significant reductions on reports of moderate physical aggression and harmful alcohol consumption, but no statistically significant effects on reports of psychological aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Mental Health Services Continuum Program (Calif.) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Adult community-based corrections | The program targets persons on parole with mental health problems and provides services to enhance their level of individual functioning in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism of mentally ill persons on parole and improve public safety. The program is rated Promising. Persons on parole who participated in the program showed a statistically significant reduction in the odds of being returned to custody. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Three Data Driven Supervision Protocols for Parole Violations (Georgia) |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Drugs | In this program, new supervision protocols for substance abuse, joblessness, and chronic violators were created based on data gathered on the behavior of the paroled person and parole officer responses. The program is rated No Effects. There was no significant impact on overall arrests or measures of recidivism. In fact, the treatment group had significantly more arrests for a new misdemeanor offense than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Special Needs Diversionary Program (SNDP) |
|
Juvenile courts, Mental health, Diversion, Case Management, Youth development, Treatment, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections | This is a diversion program that provides intensive supervision and treatment for juveniles on probation who suffer from mental illness. This program is rated Promising. The intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in number of rearrests within 1 year, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Women's Program |
|
Girls, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Stalking, Assault, Underage drinking, Campus Crime, Coping, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Schools, Crisis response | This is a sexual assault risk-reduction program that is designed to teach college women bystanders about sexual assault, characteristics of men who perpetrate the crime, and how to intervene. The program is rated Promising. Experimental group participants demonstrated statistically significant increases in their ability and willingness to intervene, compared with control group participants. However, there was no statistically significant impact on rape myth acceptance. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Click-It-or-Ticket Campaign (Mass.) |
|
Patrol, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This is a seat-belt-enforcement campaign initiated and funded by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The overall goal is to improve road safety by requiring drivers and passengers in vehicles to properly wear their seat belts. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in motor vehicle accidents, but no impact on non-fatal injuries caused by vehicle accidents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prime Time |
|
Girls, Juvenile health, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Dating violence, Youth development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Victims of crime | The program aims to reduce precursors of teen pregnancy, including sexual risk behaviors, involvement in violence, and disconnection from school. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant impact on consistency of condom use and relational aggression perpetration, but there was no statistically significant impact on physical violence victimization, relational violence victimization, stress management, interpersonal skills, or fight avoidance skills. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cardiff (Wales) Violence Prevention Programme (CVPP) |
|
Assault, Databases, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Crime prevention, Arrests, Violent crime | This program consisted of a multi-agency partnership to prevent violence and reduce violence-related emergency room admissions in Cardiff, Wales. The program is rated Promising. The program showed a statistically significant reduction in the rates of total assaults, wounding assaults, and hospital admissions related to violence, compared with the comparison sites. However, there were no statistically significant differences between Cardiff and the comparison sites in the rate of common assaults. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Broken Windows/Public Order Policing in High Crime Areas (CA) |
|
Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This program was implemented in three midsized cities near the Los Angeles, California area, with the goal of examining effects on residents’ fear of crime, perceptions of collective efficacy and police legitimacy, and actual and perceived levels of crime and disorder. The program is rated No Effects. Findings revealed no statistically significant impacts on any of the dependent variables, suggesting no indication of either beneficial effects or “backfire” effects in targeted areas. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Offender Reentry Community Safety Program |
|
Parole, Mental health, Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | Formerly called the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program, this is a reentry-planning and service program aimed at reducing recidivism for dangerously mentally ill people in Washington State. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significantly lower violent felony and overall felony recidivism rates compared with the matched control group 4 years following release from prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive-Processing Therapy for Female Victims of Sexual Assault |
|
Assault, Dating violence, Stalking, Children exposed to violence, Coping, Grief, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victims of crime, Crisis response | This is a cognitive therapeutic program that is intended to assist female victims of sexual assault with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The overall goal is to restructure unbalanced thoughts directly related to the trauma. The program is rated Effective. Women in the treatment group demonstrated reduced symptoms of both PTSD and depression, compared with women in the control group. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Washington State's Residential Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program is an alternative to incarceration for felons with substance abuse problems. In lieu of confinement, they must successfully complete a residential, chemical-dependency treatment program in the community. The program is rated Promising. Residential DOSA was shown to statistically significantly reduce overall recidivism rates compared with prison-based DOSA. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: New York Integrated Domestic Violence Courts |
|
Assault, Dating violence, Domestic violence courts, Family courts, Diversion, Courts, Intimate partner violence, Crime prevention | This program is a problem-solving court that is part of a unified “one family-one judge” model, which means all criminal, family, and matrimonial cases involving the same family are handled by one judge. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in re-arrests and conviction rates when comparing the IDV court cases with traditional family court cases. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: New York's Criminal Domestic Violence Courts |
|
Assault, Dating violence, Domestic violence courts, Family courts, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Diversion, Violent crime | The program is a problem-solving court that operate a specialized caseload for domestic violence-related cases only, and for which eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. Criminal domestic violence courts tend to be more common throughout the U.S. The program is rated No Effects. The criminal domestic violence courts in New York statistically significantly reduced case-processing time, but there was no statistically significant impact on recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cross-Age Peer Mentoring Program |
|
Afterschool, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | The program is a school-based peer mentoring program in which high school students provide one-on-one mentoring to late elementary and early middle school students. This program is rated Promising. The mentored children showed statistically significant improvement on measures of spelling achievement and connectedness to school and to parents compared with the control group. However, mentored and control group children did not significantly differ on connectedness to reading, future, or friends. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Random Drug Testing with Immediate Results and Immediate Sanctions |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Alcohol, Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Illegal substances, Opioids | This program was an experiment that was conducted to examine the efficacy of alternative methods of instant drug testing, and to determine how the different methods affected rates of relapse and recidivism of parolees with substance abuse issues. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group experienced a statistically significant decrease in rates of relapse, but no statistically significant difference in recidivism, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The RULER Approach |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program is a multiyear classroom curriculum for kindergarten through eighth grade incorporating professional development for teachers, school staff, and leaders with literacy-based, skill-building, social–emotional learning programs. This program is rated Promising. The program had statistically significant effects on emotional support, positive classroom climate, and emotion-focused interactions. However, there were no effects on negative classroom climate and classroom supportiveness. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Justice Assessment Planning Referral Placement (JARPP) |
|
Training, Parole, Probation, Personnel, Treatment, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is a training program for juvenile justice probation/parole case managers (PCMs), to promote their use of evidence-based practices to identify the mental health and substance use needs of delinquent youth and increase youth’s access to services. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in re-referral and placement rates for youth whose PCMs received the enhanced training, compared with youth whose PCMs received the standard training or no training. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Aggression Prevention Program (SAPP) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based, small-group program designed to prevent social aggression and increase empathy, prosocial behavior, and social problem–solving skills among fifth-grade females. The program is rated No Effects. Through treatment group, students demonstrated some statistically significantly improved social problem–solving skills, compared with control group students. There was no effect on prosocial behavior or social aggression. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Kids in Transition to School (KITS) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Case Management, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Home visiting, Positive youth development, School climate | This is a short-term intervention program designed to assess children in transition to kindergarten. The goal of the program is to increase school-readiness and to develop early literacy and social and self-regulation skills. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group displayed statistically significantly lower levels of oppositional and aggressive behavior as well as statistically significantly higher levels of self-regulation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pre-K RECAP |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a semi-structured, school-based intervention program developed for pre-kindergarten students seeking to improve emotional and behavioral problems and promote social skills development. The program is rated Promising. Evaluation results showed no differences regarding parent-rated behavioral problems or social skill, but teacher ratings of child behavioral problems and social skills statistically significantly improved in the intervention group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: "Seeking Safety" for Incarcerated Women |
|
Burglary, Mental health, Coping, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is a manualized cognitive–behavioral intervention for incarcerated women with co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders. The program is rated Promising. Evaluation results suggest that the program statistically significantly reduced PTSD and depression scores in program participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Eisenhower Quantum Opportunities |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | Also known as the Eisenhower Foundation’s Quantum Opportunities Program, this program is an intensive, year-round, multicomponent intervention for high-risk minority students from inner-city neighborhoods, which is provided throughout all 4 years of high school. The program is rated Effective. Program participants had statistically significantly higher grade point averages, high school graduation rates, and college acceptance rates as compared with control group youths. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Experience Corps |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a tutoring and mentoring program to improve the literacy outcomes of elementary school-aged children at risk of academic failure. This program is rated Promising. Program participants made statistically significantly greater gains in reading comprehension scores and teacher-assessed reading skills over an academic year, as compared with the control group. However, there were no differences in vocabulary and word attack scores from pre- to postintervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School Health Center Healthy Adolescents Relationships Program (SHARP) |
|
Dating violence, Mental health, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a high school-based, relationship abuse prevention program. The goal of the program was to identify students’ knowledge of abusive behaviors and teach them about relationship abuse and resources for its prevention. The program was rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on recognition, use, and knowledge of adolescent relationship abuse resources, and intentions to intervene, but participants had greater increases in recognition of sexual coercion. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: An E-mentoring Program for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities |
|
Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This program was designed to help high school students with mild learning disabilities improve their ability to identify postsecondary career goals. This program is rated Promising. The program group showed statistically significant improvement in social connectedness, transition competency, and self-determination, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in career/educational goals, academic connectedness, and familial connectedness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Program - Multisite |
|
Coping, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Prosecution, Courts, Victims of crime | The program uses specially trained nurses to provide comprehensive psychological, medical, and forensic services to recent sexual assault victims in either hospital- or community-based clinic settings. The program is rated Promising. Across multiple sites, the results showed that sexual assault cases that were prosecuted following implementation of SANE had a statistically significant greater likelihood of resulting in a guilty plea or conviction. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: In-Prison Visitation (Florida) |
|
Crime prevention | Visitation in prison allows incarcerated persons to connect to the outside world by developing social bonds with family members and friends. The overall goal of in-prison visitation is to reduce recidivism and assist in helping incarcerated persons adjust to transitioning back into their community. The program is rated Promising. The recidivism rate was statistically significantly lower for incarcerated persons who received visitation compared with those who did not receive visitation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Fostering Healthy Futures® for Preteens |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a positive youth development program for preadolescent children (ages 9-11) who have current or previous child welfare involvement due to one or more adverse childhood experiences. The program is rated Promising. Children who participated in the program displayed statistically significant reductions in posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, and scores on key mental health outcomes, compared with children in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Tri-Ministry Study |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare | This is a school-based trial that incorporated three programs: a Classwide Social Skills Program, a Connections Partner Reading Program, and a combination of both programs. The program is rated No Effects. There were statistically significant improvements on teacher- and parent-rated measures of externalizing problems. But there were no statistically significant effects on inappropriate classroom behavior and teacher- and parent-rated social skills. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: CHOICE |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, School safety, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a voluntary afterschool program for middle school aged youths to inform them about substance use and prevent them from starting or continuing alcohol use. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on delaying the initiation of alcohol use, but not on other measures of past or future alcohol use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Helping Women Recover Program (in a Drug Court Setting) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug courts, Drug-Related Victimization, Problem-solving courts | This is an interactive gender-responsive program designed to treat drug-addicted convicted females in a drug court setting. The program intends to specifically address the needs of female addicts and treat symptoms identified as distinct to female pathways to criminality and drug involvement. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in arrests or drug use, at the 18-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Moving to Opportunity Demonstration Program |
|
Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a housing mobility demonstration program intended to help move families from high-poverty public housing to low-poverty private housing to improve their lives. This program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have no statistically significant long-term effects on violent, property, drug, or general crime arrests. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Exile |
|
Gun violence, Homicide, Mandatory sentencing, Community policing, Crime prevention | A crime reduction strategy in Richmond, Virginia implemented to deter former and persons with the potential to commit a crime from carrying and using firearms, with an overall goal of reducing firearm-related homicides. The project is rated Promising. Firearm-related homicides decreased significantly in the target area, compared with other U.S. cities where the program was not implemented. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Stop School Bullying (Greece) |
|
Bullying, Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a preventative, school-based program for students in 4th, 5th, and 6th grades (ages 9–12) that sought to reduce rates of bullying and victimization within elementary schools. The program is rated Effective. Evaluation results suggest that the program statistically significantly reduced bullying and victimization rates at schools that implemented the program compared with a control group of schools that did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ending Violence |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Coping, School climate, Victimization, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based education program designed to teach students the warning signs of dating violence. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant impacts on perceptions of helpfulness in others, likelihood of seeking help, perpetration, victimization, and abusive or fearful dating experiences. However, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge of dating violence in treatment group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Peer Group Connection (PGC) Program |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | A high school transition program that targets ninth-grade students who are at risk of dropping out. Its goal is to improve high school graduation rates. This program is rated No Effects. The program did not have a statistically significant overall effect on students’ high school graduation rates or on several other measures (such as credits earned). There was a statistically significant positive effect on school attachment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The GREAT School Program |
|
School safety, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based intervention designed to promote nonviolent goals and beliefs and to discourage aggression. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant impacts on individual norms for aggression or nonviolence, goals and strategies supporting aggression or nonviolence, or beliefs supporting fighting or nonviolence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: WITS Primary Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a community-based, schoolwide intervention aimed at children in grades 1 through 3 that targets socially competent behaviors and risks for peer victimization. The program was rated Promising. The program was shown to have statistically significant, positive effects on physical and relational victimization and social competence, but not on social responsibility or physical aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Community policing, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention | A crime focused initiative, designed to address gang-related gun homicides in selected cities. The initiative involved a comprehensive model of suppression (enforcement), prevention, and reentry. The program is rated Promising. There was a significant reduction in gun homicides related to gang crime in cities that implemented the initiative. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: INSIGHTS into Children's Temperament |
|
School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based intervention program delivered to urban elementary students, with the participation of parents and teachers, to address disruptive behaviors. The program was rated Effective. In both studies, authors found that the intervention had a statistically significant effect on behavior problems exhibited by children. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bully-Proofing Your School |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based intervention program focused on reducing instances of bullying and victimization, while increasing the safety of students in grades 3–5. The program is rated Promising. In all outcomes, the treatment schools showed statistically significant reductions in bullying, victimization, and witnessed aggression, as well as statistically significant increases in perceptions of safety at school. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prevention Program for Externalizing Problem Behavior (PEP) |
|
School safety, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | The program is a preventative, group-based training intervention for parents and kindergarten teachers of young children with externalizing problem behaviors. The program seeks to reduce problem behaviors and ultimately prevent delinquency later in life. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group mothers and teachers reported statistically significantly fewer child problem behaviors, compared with the control group. However, there was no effect of observer-rated problem behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Sexual Assault Risk Reduction Program |
|
Assault, Dating violence, Campus Crime, Coping, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a rape prevention program for college students, designed to teach about the prevalence of sexual assault, distinguish between rape myths and facts, identify risky situations, and teach techniques to use in a risky situation. The program was rated No Effects. The program had a statistically significant effect on self-efficacy and self-protective dating behaviors, but did not impact sexual victimization, sexual aggression, attitudes toward women, rape empathy, or sexual communication. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Parole, Probation, Alcohol, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Intimate partner violence, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement | This program seeks to reduce the recidivism of persons previously convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI) through intensive testing and monitoring of drug and alcohol consumption. The main goal is to encourage sobriety of convicted persons 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. The program is rated Promising. The program led to a statistically significant reduction in repeat DUI and domestic violence arrests, but did not impact first-time DUI arrests or traffic crashes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Neighborhood Enrichment with Vision Involving Services, Treatment, and Supervision (NEW VISTAS) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Probation, Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Intake/assessment, Community policing, Case Management, Youth development, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program consisted of a comprehensive, neighborhood-based, family-focused service delivery model that employed wraparound services and case management for justice-involved families with identified substance abuse problems. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth had a statistically significant decrease in noninstitutional and institutional out-of-home placements, compared with comparison group youth. However, there was no statistically significant difference in recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Achievement Mentoring Program (AMP) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is an intervention for urban minority freshmen at risk of dropping out of high school. The goal was to enhance school-related cognitions and behaviors. The program is rated Promising. The program did not statistically significantly impact students’ absences, grade point averages, or decision-making efficacy, but had statistically significant effects on discipline referrals, negative school behavior, performance in mathematics and language arts, and other self-reported outcomes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Comer's School Development Program |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), School climate | This is a school-based intervention involving administrators, teachers, staff, and parents that aims to improve relationships and school climate to enhance student achievement. The program is rated Promising. Students in treatment schools reported statistically significant reductions in the frequency of angry feelings and acting out, and greater disapproval of misbehavior, compared with students in control schools. There were no statistically significant differences in substance use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Rockford Pulling Levers Drug Market Intervention |
|
Drug possession, Databases, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Procedural justice, Drug markets, Crime prevention, Law enforcement | A problem-oriented policing strategy that aims to combat drug markets and the problems associated with them, in a high- crime neighborhood, through a deterrence-based, pulling levers framework. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to significantly reduce nonviolent offenses in the target area, but not violent offenses. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Red Hook Community Justice Center: Family Court for Juveniles |
|
Administrative Employees, Restitution, Family courts, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile justice | This is a problem-solving community court that seeks to prevent crime. One component of the program, the Family Court, hears juvenile delinquency cases involving youth aged 15 or younger, with the goal of responding to the specific needs of youth in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. The program was rated No Effects. The program had no significant effect on recidivism rates for juvenile defendants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Check-Up (FCU) for Adolescents |
|
Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mental health, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-centered intervention designed to assist families with high-risk adolescents. The goal is to reduce the growth of adolescents’ problem behaviors and substance abuse. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed statistically significantly less growth of antisocial behavior and in alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use compared with the control group. Participants also had stable GPAs from the start of middle school into high school and fewer school absences. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: It's Your Game... Keep It Real |
|
School safety, Dating violence, Victimization, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victims of crime | A health education program for 7th and 8th graders designed to delay sexual behavior and promote healthy dating relationships. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce emotional and physical dating violence victimization. However, the program did not have a statistically significant effect on physical perpetration of dating violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Mental Health Courts (Multisite) |
|
Mental health courts, Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections | This program consists of post-booking jail diversion mental health courts, which seek to keep justice-involved individuals with serious mental illnesses out of the court system and place them into community-based treatment without jeopardizing public safety. This program is rated Promising. Mental health courts in the four studied cities were shown to have statistically significant reductions in participants’ rates of arrests and incarceration days at the 18-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Check-Up (FCU) for Children |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Family reunification, Youth development, Home visiting, Positive youth development | The program is a preventative, family-based intervention targeting families with young children who possess risk factors for child behavioral misconduct. The program is rated Promising. Evaluation results showed that the children of families who participated in the intervention demonstrated statistically significantly reduced problem and externalizing behaviors, compared with children of families in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Keep Cool...Start at School |
|
School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools | This is a social, cognitive–behavioral treatment program that targeted children ages 8 to 12 who exhibited disruptive or aggressive behavior and conduct disorder. The program is rated No Effects. Overall, the evidence from the evaluation found that students who participated in the intervention did not statistically significantly differ from those students in the waitlist control group on measures of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and externalization of behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Private Prison Confinement (Minnesota) |
|
Recidivism, Crime prevention | In Minnesota, bed shortages created an increase in the prison population in the first few years following 2000, resulting in eligible male inmates being transferred to a private prison facility to serve their time. The program was rated No Effects. Confinement in the private prison resulted in statistically significant increases in the risk of rearrest and reconviction. There was no statistically significant impact on reincarceration for a new offense or revocation for a technical violation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Transfer to Adult Court (Pennsylvania) |
|
Juvenile courts, Violent offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention | Transfer of serious and violent juveniles from juvenile court to adult court based on criteria, such as age, seriousness of offense, and use of a deadly weapon. The program is rated No Effects. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that transferring juveniles to adult court had no impact on measures of arrests. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Tax Compliance Experiment (Israel) |
|
Crime prevention | A Tax Compliance Experiment was conducted in Israel and sought to test whether taxpayer compliance could be increased by mailing two different types of letters to incorporated taxpayers: a deterrent letter or moral persuasion letter. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the corporate taxpayer treatment groups and the control group in the likelihood of paying taxes or the likelihood of accurately reporting tax deductions and gross sales. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||